The effect of the interviewer including legal experts in the panel discussion is that It exposes how the system does not take responsibility for its actions. Option C
This is further explained below.
<h3>What is the effect of the interviewer including legal experts in the panel discussion?</h3>
Generally, If the Office's findings, conclusions, or recommendations have any legal implications, they must be handled by a Legal Expert, who may be an Advisor, Associate Advisor, Consultant, or another official with relevant credentials and expertise in the law.
In conclusion, By having legal experts on the panel, the interviewer is able to demonstrate how the system avoids accountability. C as a viable alternative
Read more about legal experts
brainly.com/question/1346208
#SPJ1
CQ
What is the effect of the interviewer including legal experts in the panel discussion?
A. It discredits the impact of the Gault case on the juvenile justice system.
B. It reveals the positive changes to the system that the public ignores.
C. It exposes how the system does not take responsibility for their actions.
D. It offers insight into the state of the juvenile justice system.
These two ports were where they inported and expoted goods in Georgia. During WWII they also built Liberty ships for the war and this provided lots of jobs for people, which was needed in Georgia since many people were unemployed.
According to the people of the West, it should be the governments who should take charge and pay for the internal improvements in a nation. This came from an earlier way of thinking, when nations like the U.S were being formed as a new state, and leaders and citizens wondered whose responsibility it was to make sure that the internal situation regarding transportation, healthcare, infrastructure and communications was taken care of. Especially in the U.S, earlier leaders decided that the responsibility of internal improvements should not fall on individuals but should be given to the government.
Answer:
does this describe classical conditioning?
Explanation: