You need to simplify it
lets start with your orgininal equation here:
-5+3x=10
Now lets try and get "x" alone. we will do this by adding 5 to both sides.
-5+3x=10
+5 +5
3x=15
Now we have 3 times "x" equals 15
The next step would be to divide both sides by 3 in order to get "x" alone.
3x=15
x=15/3
x=5
I believe the answer would be 8
The answer to your question is 55.93
Answer:
The answer to your question is the second choice tan Ф = -3/4
Step-by-step explanation:
Data
sin Ф = -3/5
cos Ф > 0
Process
1.- The sin Ф is negative, which means that is in the third or fourth quadrant.
2.- sin Ф = -3/5 and sin Ф = Opposite side/hypotenuse
then, Opposite side = 3 hypotenuse = 5
3.- Calculate the adjacent side using the Pythagorean theorem
c² = a² + b²
b² = c² - a²
b² = 25 - 9
b² = 16
b = 4
4.- If cos Ф is in the third quadrant
cos Ф = -4/5 and cos Ф < 0 This is incorrect
5.- If cos Ф is in the fourth quadrant
cos Ф = 4/5 and cos Ф > 0 This is correct
Then, this angle is in the fourth quadrant
6.- Calculate tan Ф
tan Ф = -3/4
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Sue's initial wage per hour = $10
Sue's wage per hour after the increase = $100
a. Economic surplus to be enjoyed = $100 - $10
= $90
Sue would enjoy an economic surplus of $90.
b. No, because in this case the wage per hour for each 400 student would be;
=
= $0.25
= 25 cents
Redistribution of income is the act of equal sharing of wealth among a certain number of people.
The problem here is that Sue would feel cheated with the division of the earnings among 400 students, but very happy when her wages was increased.
Though the income incentive redistribution programs reduce poverty, but it may be unfair.