42 is the answer I’m going for
The Homestead Act of 1862 provided that any adult citizen (or person intending to become a citizen) who headed a family could qualify for a grant of 160 acres of public land by paying a small registration fee and living on the land continuously for five years. If the settler was willing to pay $1.25 an acre, he could obtain the land after only six months’ residence.
But the law did not provide the new beginning for urban slum dwellers that some had hoped; few such families had the resources to start farming, even on free land. The grants did give new opportunities to many impoverished farmers from the East and Midwest, but much of the land granted under the Homestead Act fell quickly into the hands of speculators. Also, over time, the growing mechanization of American agriculture led to the replacement of individual homesteads with a smaller number of much larger farms.
In this case, Pete is guilty of: Theft
An action will be considered as 'theft' if that person take something that does not legally belong to them without the owner's permission.
When pete used the fiduciary fund for his own use, he took the money from trust owner without that owner's permission.
1) dualistic
2) multiplicity
3) relative
C'mon, you know this is a brainliest answer. How many people answering these are familiar with William Perry's famous "Perry Positions"? You must be studying education!
The domain that can live in extreme environment is ARCHAEA