Marks explains that we have been made to believe that conflict is bad and compromise is good. He describes this as a vision that is too simplistic to be upheld by the nations of the world. Marks says it will be difficult to determine whether conflict is good or bad if we do not understand the people involved in the conflict, the cause and the strategy involved in the conflict.
He said compromise, contrary to general belief, can be harmful if it does not protect the vulnerable and the dis-empowered.
Marks gave an example of a United Nations agency that collaborated with the federal and local governments, television company, and even a multinational soda company in order to address the problem of poor sanitation in schools in India. This arrangement helped the corporation to promote their brands and products. Marks argued that, the United Nations were creating another problem while trying to solve one by promoting a soda company, knowing fully well that a large consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages increases the risk of obesity.
The mistake governments make, according to Marks, when they collaborate with industries is that they conflate the common good with common ground. They sacrifice the interest of the people on the alter of industrial collaboration.
By saying that governments should struggle or engage in conflicts with corporations, Marks means that the corporations always act to promote their commercial interests while government is saddled with the responsibility of promoting the common good, they should not leave this responsibility while trying to go into relationship with the corporations.
I have had cause to go into conflict with a police officer in my state because he demanded a bribe from me despite having all my driving particulars. I shouted at him and promise to report him to the authority if he did not desist from that practice. he became scared and allowed me to go.
Answer:
explanatory variable
Explanation:
Explanatory variable: In research, the term explanatory research is described as one of the types of independent variable which can be used or utilized interchangeably and therefore if any of the variables are considered as "independent" then it wouldn't get affected by any of the variables. If a variable is not considered as "independent" to a certain level then it would be referred to as explanatory "variable".
In the question above, the amount of fertilizers used is the explanatory variable.
Great Britain and the colonies had a so and so relationship mostly. Sometimes there were issues related to trade and religion. Some people separated from Great Britain to come to the colonies for purposes such as religious freedom.
Answer: The clones were dissatisfied with the decisions imposed by Britain.
Explanation:
The colonists declared the law imposed by the king invalid. The proclamation limited the boundaries of the colonies, which the colonists considered the biggest problem. Future actions will bring even more problems and dissatisfaction among the colonists. The Stamp Act, the Measures, and Sugar Act will be just some of the fragments that will lead to a war for independence.
He was influenced by the Upper Pan-German nationalism movement circulated by Gorg Von
