Answer: Parents pressure their children in the areas of education, career and attitude, comparing them to be like their siblings, friends or relatives againts their wish in most cases.
Explanation:
Peer pressure is a major concern for many homes where children are trained. Many children growing up has been put under pressure by their loved ones in terms of success and attitude in comparison with their friends or relatives. Peer pressure could be defined as the scenario where an individual is pressured by friends, colleagues or family to act like who they don't want to. Peer pressure and family comparison began with parents, who feel their children are not meeting up with their colleagues or relatives and tend to push them to perform.
Areas where parents enforce this pressure is in education, career, attitude. They make their children or guardian to do better, like who they are compared to even when the individual doesn't have intentions of doing so.
Answer: Larceny
Explanation:
Crime of larceny is known as breaking law in terms of theft .It can involves several activities such as shoplifting, stealing art works , personal possessions of others, robbing automobiles etc.This crime deprives other people from their own belonging.
According to the question,Jenna has stolen Olivia's ring which she has taken off for work and did not return it to her. Thus, she has stolen possession of Olivia which remarks about crime of larceny.
Answer: <em>True.</em>
Controlling is a managerial functions which is considered to be an important function since it assists in checking the errors and thereby taking the corrective action, so the digression from the basics are minimized and goals of the company are accomplished in an adequate manner. Under modern concepts, control is known as a anticipative behavior whereas concept of control used earlier was only utilized when errors occurred.
This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is the following:
Ms. Coulter was successful using a token reinforcement system with Jordan to decrease his inappropriate behaviors in class. Mr. Johnson is now going to implement the same token system in his class in hope that Jordan's behavior will improve. This is an example of what generalization technique?
a. train loosely
b. sequentially modify
c. introduce to naturally maintaining contingencies
d. mediate generalization
Answer:
This is an example of:
b. sequentially modify
Explanation:
Sequential modification refers to the implementation of a certain system or procedure in different settings, expecting similar results to occur. For instance, a certain reinforcement system was applied at school. It generated a change in behavior at school, but not at home. Then, it is applied at home with the purpose of generating a change of behavior there as well. This is what we have in the passage provided. Mr. Johnson wishes to obtain the same or similar results to Ms. Coulter's by applying the same token reinforcement system.
Answer: The situation is unconstitutional because it is defamation or libel
Explanation: The freedom of the press is guaranteed by the First Amendment of the American Constitution, which regulates all the rights and obligations of the media, including the press. This means that everyone has the right to freely report and write, and freely express their opinions without censorship. However, there are some limitations when it comes to press freedom. There are, among other things, the extent to which the journalist, i.e the writer of the article, can secure the protection of a confidential source, then also indecency. In this our case it is defamation which, when it comes to defamation in the press, calls libel. If Nancy wanted to make up a story about a politician she personally dislikes, then it is defamation. The First Amendment also does not guarantee the journalist the right to interfere personal feelings about the politician with professional writing in the newspaper. This means that if Nancy made up the story of a politician without real evidence of any wrongdoing, then it was defamation in the newspaper, therefore, libel.
