Answer:
Dred Scott
Explanation:
The Dred Scott case, also known as Dred Scott v. Sandford, the case led to a decade-long battle for freedom by a Black slave named Dred Scott, which proceeded through several courts before reaching the U.S. Supreme Court, whose decision frustrated abolitionists, gave momentum to the anti-slavery movement, and served as a milestone for the anti-slavery movement.
Answer:1. adversarial system of justice
2. Pretrial, trial and post trial
3. What must be determined during the trial
4. Defendant, service of process
5. False
6.counterclaim
7.
Explanation:
1. This is a system of justicee whereby advocates are allowed to represent their clients and a jury eventually gives a judgement as to whether the the client is guilty or innocent. It is usually practised in common law countries.
2.Pretrial being the 1st phase in this phase, the defendant determines how best to to represent himself as well as providing answers to the complaint laid against him
Trial stage is that stage where the fact and figures are being gathered by both paties and presented to the jury
Post trial stage. It is at this stage that the jury passes a judgement based on the evidences provided.
4. Anderson is the defendant because
he his the one who has committed an offence and has a case to prove.
5. Anderson cannot claim that LI is lying about the accident because their would be evidences against him. He can only give reasons why he
ran into li's car.
6. Maxwell can Counterclaim because it was a collision. Maxwell can claim that it was actually Julian that collided with him because they were but in motion.
Answer:
Yes this is against the Indian constitution.
Explanation:
This is actually against the constitution. The Constitution has made provision for equal rights to the law for everybody. All the citizens of India are equal before law. There is also equal protection of law to all by the Constitution. The constitution provides for the safety of its citizens and ensures everyone is accorded justice.
The Constitution does not provide for a minister to misuse his power. The minister misuses his power by asking the police not to register case against his relatives. and thus the later can not ask a police officer not to register a complaint against his relative. This is not in accordance with the principle of equality.
Answer: Many institutions have conflict of commitment policies even though they are not strictly required to by federal agencies.
Explanation:
Out of the options given, the statement that is true is that many institutions have conflict of commitment policies even though they are not strictly required to by federal agencies.
The statement that Federal agencies require its institutions to have a conflict of conscience policy and that Federals agencies require institutions to have policies on both the conflict of commitment and the conflict of conscience are not true.
Various factors contribute to why there are increasing number of student finding access to abuse substances.
- Easy accessibility within the school premises. Vendors of those product find ways to sell these substances to the student within the premises.
- Pressure group. The feeling of wanting to belonging to friend circle lead student to abuse substances.
- Ignorance: Some student do not have knowledge of the negative effect of substance being abused.
- Lack of proper care: Absence of proper care and monitoring of student activities leave them open to perform all form of substance abuse and related atrocities.
<em>Learn more about this here</em>
<em>brainly.com/question/24142163</em>
