Answer and Explanation:
In an action based on strict liability, a plaintiff must show that
(1) a product was defective,
(2) the defendant was in the business of distributing the product,
(3) the product was unreasonably dangerous due to the defect,
(4) the plaintiff suffered harm,
(5) the defect was the proximate cause of the harm, and
(6) the goods were not substantially changed from the time they were sold.
A plaintiff does not have to show that there was a failure to exercise due care, and this distinguishes an action based on strict liability from an action based on negligence, which requires proof of a lack of due care. If Bob establishes his case, the court in this problem is most likely to rule in his favor, because the manufacturer is strictly liable in this case. Strict liability allows a plaintiff to recover damages for injuries resulting from product defects without proof of fault.
Answer:
Explanation:
Let the cost of an order = C
Let the number of tickets inside that order = n
Let there be a 15 dollar service charge per order.
================
C = 35*n + 15
Answer:
The answer is "The first choice".
Explanation:
Please find the graph file of the given question:
In the given question the first choice is correct because in the graph it has 3 dots, which denotes the (tv's) in 2 that is equal to the two houses.
Answer:
D) $4,200
Explanation:
the business investigation expenses of a taxpayer who is already engaged in a similar trade or business are fully deductible in the year incurred regardless of whether or not the taxpayer goes into a new business.
Therefore, the maximum amount of deduction for the current year is
$4,200.
I think the better one is D.
