1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
alex41 [277]
3 years ago
12

How did we transform from f(x) =x2 to g(x) = -3x2

Mathematics
1 answer:
Oksi-84 [34.3K]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

  f(x) is reflected over the x-axis and vertically scaled by a factor of 3

Step-by-step explanation:

If you compare the two functions, you see that ...

  g(x) = -3f(x)

Multiplication by -1 effects a reflection over the x-axis. (All y-values are transformed to their opposite.)

Multiplication by 3 is a vertical scaling by a factor of 3.

Taken together, f(x) is reflected over the x-axis and vertically scaled by a factor of 3.

You might be interested in
Mya's dog weighs 42.8 pounds. Lydia's dog weighs 2.9
expeople1 [14]

Answer:

124.12 pounds

Step-by-step explanation:

42.8 x 2.9

= 124.12

= 124.12 pounds

7 0
3 years ago
Help me plz..........
vekshin1

Answer:

The answer to your question is the third option

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The plane x+y+2z=8 intersects the paraboloid z=x2+y2 in an ellipse. Find the points on this ellipse that are nearest to and fart
DiKsa [7]

Answer:

The minimum distance of   √((195-19√33)/8)  occurs at  ((-1+√33)/4; (-1+√33)/4; (17-√33)/4)  and the maximum distance of  √((195+19√33)/8)  occurs at (-(1+√33)/4; - (1+√33)/4; (17+√33)/4)

Step-by-step explanation:

Here, the two constraints are

g (x, y, z) = x + y + 2z − 8  

and  

h (x, y, z) = x ² + y² − z.

Any critical  point that we find during the Lagrange multiplier process will satisfy both of these constraints, so we  actually don’t need to find an explicit equation for the ellipse that is their intersection.

Suppose that (x, y, z) is any point that satisfies both of the constraints (and hence is on the ellipse.)

Then the distance from (x, y, z) to the origin is given by

√((x − 0)² + (y − 0)² + (z − 0)² ).

This expression (and its partial derivatives) would be cumbersome to work with, so we will find the the extrema  of the square of the distance. Thus, our objective function is

f(x, y, z) = x ² + y ² + z ²

and

∇f = (2x, 2y, 2z )

λ∇g = (λ, λ, 2λ)

µ∇h = (2µx, 2µy, −µ)

Thus the system we need to solve for (x, y, z) is

                           2x = λ + 2µx                         (1)

                           2y = λ + 2µy                       (2)

                           2z = 2λ − µ                          (3)

                           x + y + 2z = 8                      (4)

                           x ² + y ² − z = 0                     (5)

Subtracting (2) from (1) and factoring gives

                     2 (x − y) = 2µ (x − y)

so µ = 1  whenever x ≠ y. Substituting µ = 1 into (1) gives us λ = 0 and substituting µ = 1 and λ = 0  into (3) gives us  2z = −1  and thus z = − 1 /2 . Subtituting z = − 1 /2  into (4) and (5) gives us

                            x + y − 9 = 0

                         x ² + y ² +  1 /2  = 0

however, x ² + y ² +  1 /2  = 0  has no solution. Thus we must have x = y.

Since we now know x = y, (4) and (5) become

2x + 2z = 8

2x  ² − z = 0

so

z = 4 − x

z = 2x²

Combining these together gives us  2x²  = 4 − x , so

2x²  + x − 4 = 0 which has solutions

x =  (-1+√33)/4

and

x = -(1+√33)/4.

Further substitution yeilds the critical points  

((-1+√33)/4; (-1+√33)/4; (17-√33)/4)   and

(-(1+√33)/4; - (1+√33)/4; (17+√33)/4).

Substituting these into our  objective function gives us

f((-1+√33)/4; (-1+√33)/4; (17-√33)/4) = (195-19√33)/8

f(-(1+√33)/4; - (1+√33)/4; (17+√33)/4) = (195+19√33)/8

Thus minimum distance of   √((195-19√33)/8)  occurs at  ((-1+√33)/4; (-1+√33)/4; (17-√33)/4)  and the maximum distance of  √((195+19√33)/8)  occurs at (-(1+√33)/4; - (1+√33)/4; (17+√33)/4)

4 0
3 years ago
Jada says that she found three different ways to complete the first question correctly. Do you think this is possible? Explain y
Andrew [12]

Answer:

Yes.

Step-by-step explanation:

Although there is not much info on this question, if you were to assume that there are 3 different answers or 3 different methods of solving that problem, it is definitey possible to assume that this is possible.

7 0
3 years ago
HELP ME PLSSSSSS ASAP
Basile [38]

Answer:

the answer is 200 mph because you take and divide the 400 miles by 20 mph

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How many sides of a polygon have if the sum of the measures of its angle is 2880?
    6·1 answer
  • Evaluate 32 + (7 − 2) ⋅ 4 − 6 over 3 .
    8·1 answer
  • My answer was B is less than or equal to 10, but it was wrong. So what does B equal??
    15·1 answer
  • Pooky eats three cans of cat food each day. How long will 27 cans of food last?
    5·2 answers
  • Can a real number be both rational and irrational?
    13·1 answer
  • Which expression are greater than 1/2? Choose all the apply
    7·1 answer
  • Please help.
    13·1 answer
  • Jack's Plumbing charges customers $100 per hour for repair jobs. A-1 Plumbing charges according to
    13·1 answer
  • I need the answer for this asp.
    7·2 answers
  • Find the Area Of each circle.
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!