Answer:
Alcohol withdrawal syndrome
Explanation:
The question actually tells us that Heather is having physical withdrawal symptoms after she stopped drinking.
In particular, Alcohol withdrawal syndrome includes various symptoms such like <u>headache, nausea, vomiting, insomnia, shaking hands, trembling and sweating.</u> As time passes <u>hallucinations</u> can also happen (after 24 hours) and the symptoms can continue getting worse: between 48 to 72 hours, <u>delirium tremens </u>can take place (this refers to vivid hallucinations) but it can also include heavy sweating and a rapid heart beat.
We can see that the symptoms Heather has after 24 hours without having alcohol are some from the alcohol withdrawal syndrome (trembling, vivid dreams, sweating, rapid heart rate, nausea, among others).
It is because Galen based his information about anatomy on what he had found out during dissecting the bodies of animals. This created mistakes on his claims in human anatomy. Some of these anatomical errors were the following:
1. He thought muscles are attached to the bone just like in dogs.
2. He thought that the liver produces blood. He then realized that it flowed around the body, but he claimed that is burned fuel for the muscle.
3. He thought that there are holes through the septum, which allowed the blood to flow from one side to another of the heart.
4. He thought that there are blood vessels in the brain.
5. He thought human’s jaw was made up of two bones just like a dog’s.
6. He made mistakes about the liver’s shape.
Personally, I believe that differing political views result in greater political participation because of a persons need to help the side they support win. Take this for example: Republican and democratic parties have come to an issue where they see two completely different solutions. The republicans are scared that if they don't have great amounts of participation, the democrats will win and the democrats are scared of they don't have great amounts of participation, the republicans will win. This need to help the idea they support win drives a greater amount of political participation form both sides and is applicable to any differing political views. Hope this helps! :)
Based on the situation, it's not to be considered as a good law. It is because it is unlikely and there is a small chance of a person who performs a CPR to another person who needs it to determine whether the person has AIDS or infectious because the situation is something to be acted quickly because the patient may die.
