Answer:
yniar hcum oot sti ereh pleh esaelp retaw eht rednu ma i uoy era woh olleh
Step-by-step explanation:yniar hcum oot sti ereh pleh esaelp retaw eht rednu ma i uoy era woh ollehyniar hcum oot sti ereh pleh esaelp retaw eht rednu ma i uoy era woh ollehyniar hcum oot sti ereh pleh esaelp retaw eht rednu ma i uoy era woh ollehyniar hcum oot sti ereh pleh esaelp retaw eht rednu ma i uoy era csacasccacwoh ollehyniar hcum oot sti ereh pleh esaelp retaw eht rednu ma i uoy era woh ollehyniar hcum oot sti ereh pleh esaelp retaw eht rednu ma i uoy era woh ollehyniar hcum oot sti ereh pleh esaelp retaw eht rednu ma i uoy era woh ollehyniar hcum oot sti ereh pleh esaelp retaw eht rednu ma i uoy era woh olleh
Answer:
A: I assume that the equation 4x+2 has a greater rate of change.
B: The function F has a greater y intercept.
Step-by-step explanation:
Trend in the table is multiply the x by 3 then add 6.
Your equation would be y = 3x+6 for the table.
1/2 as a decimal is .5 ( it means .50) hoped it helped
Answer:
9.75 hours
Step-by-step explanation:
If Rob drove 35% of the time and Mark drove the remainder of the time, the total is 100 %
100-35 = 65
so Mark drove 65% of the time
The total time driven was 15 hours, so we multiply the total time driven by the percentage of time that Mark drove to find the number of hours that Mark drove.
15 * 65%
15*.65
9.75 hours
Answer: No, they are not proportional
Explanation: 24/25 is not proportional to 38/40 because multiplying 24 to get 38 is 1.58 while multiplying 25 to get 40 is 1.6
