Assuming each statement is claiming the first set is a subset of N, the second statement is false. 0 is not part of the natural numbers.
Answer:
Line 3 is incorrect; we don't know anything about the lengths of HG, FG, HE, and EF, so this line is not valid based on the given information.
Step-by-step explanation:
In the Noah's poof of the construction, segment EG would divide angle FGH into two equal parts, which makes line 2 to be valid. i.e <EGH ≅ <EGF. And it can also be observed that line 4 is a valid theorem in proving the congruent nature of triangles.
But line 3 is not valid because of the condition of the statement. Furthermore, segments FG, EG, HG, HE and FE may not be congruent. Thus, the condition of the statement in line 3 is incorrect.
Answer:
D
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
pair of pants = $53
Step-by-step explanation:
s = shirts
p = pair of pants
eq = equation
eq 1: 7s + 5p = 517
eq 2: s + p = 89
multiply the equation 2 by 7
eq 3: 7s + 7p = 623
negate equation 1 and add it to the eq 3
7s + 7p = 623
+ -7s - 5p = -517
2p = 106
p = 53
Answer: 2 + 3/8 is 2 3/8, 19/8, or 2.375
Step-by-step explanation:
