Answer:
Explanation:
this problem can be solved applying the concept of annuity, keep in mind that an annuity is a formula which allows you to calculate the future value of future payments affected by an interest rate.by definition the future value of an annuity is given by:
where 
is the future value of the annuity, 
is the interest rate for every period payment, n is the number of payments, and P is the regular amount paid
But there is an special thing to keep in mind and is the initial payment so we must to calculate the 4,000 in the future so we have:
Answer:
The monarchs continued to challenge Parliament's authority.
Explanation:
Following the English Civil War, tensions between the monarchs and Parliament began to grow. Queen Elizabeth did not leave any heir, therefore, James I began the Stuart Dynasty. James I believed in Divine Rule, which was in oppose of Queen Elizabeth's rule who worked with Parliament.
After the English Civil War, the monarchs continues to challenge Parliament's authority. During Restoration monarchs, Charles II and James II, Parliament and monarchs were in conflict with each other.
Therefore, option C is correct.
Answer:
Explanation:
Bank Reconciliation: The bank reconciliation deals with the bank statement balance and the cash statement balance. The motive is to compare these two statements so that the organization can run in the smoothly manner.
There are various transactions due to which the bank statement balance and the cash statement balance do not match. To match these statements, we adjust the transactions accordingly.
The outstanding deposits is computed below:
= Company cash receipts - bank deposited
= $74,640 - $71,375
= $3,265
And, the outstanding checks is computed below:
= Company written checks - Processed by bank
= $72,515 - $71,270
= $1,245
The preparation of the bank reconciliation statement on October 31, 2015 for Damon Company's is presented in the spreadsheet. Kindly find the attachment below:
Answer:
a. True
Explanation:
The sole proprietorship and partnerships outnumber corporations in United States but they net fewer sales and less income than corporations, individually and when combined.
Answer:
a. 1, 5 and 7
b. Resources will be allocated inefficiently
c. Differing sizes and capacities
d. Benefits due to economies of scale
e. Reduce prices and improve resource allocation.
Explanation:
The correct combination is 1, 5 and 7. The price of a pure monopoly firm is much higher than that of purely competitive firm because the later is a price taker while the former is a price fixer. Because of this, output of monopoly is lower while the profit margin is higher than that of competitive firm.
Assuming that a pure monopolist and a purely competitive firm have the same unit costs. In the case of a pure monopolist, resources will be allocated inefficiently because the monopolist does not produce at the point of minimum Average Total Cost and does not equate price and Marginal cost.
Even though both monopolists and competitive firms follow the MC = MR rule in maximizing profits, there are differences in the economic outcomes because pure competitors lack capacity and are smaller in size while the monopolist has the capacity to expand inorder to maximize profits.
The costs of a purely competitive firm and a monopoly may be different because the monopolist is capable of taking advantage of cost reduction arising from economics of scale. Pure competitors does not experience economies of scale due to their small sizes.
If a monopoly can experience economies of scale, it can reduce prices beyond that of the pure competitor thereby ensuring a more efficient resource allocation.
