Answer:
the court would rule in favor of the hospital
Explanation:
Based on the information provided with regards to the situation at hand it can be said that the court would rule in favor of the hospital. This is because the hospital can easily prove that the employee used hospital property (computer) for viewing inappropriate photos, which can count as both unreasonable expectation of privacy as well as sexual harassment since he showed those explicit photos to coworkers
Answer:
The following would be the important to establish in order to evaluate the official's prediction:
B. Whether Targland is able to enforce the regulations with respect to all-terrain.
Explanation:
- The option A is not valid as this statement has no impact on the prediction of the officials because they are focusing on blocking the access of Targland on vehicles.
- The option B is valid as this is the concern of the officials whether they will be able to implement their policies to all over the terrain.
- The option C is not valid as this statement has not such impact on the prediction of the officials.
- The option D is not valid as that whether if people are encountering tortoise or not, the main problem is that people shouldn't be able to take the tortoises outside.
- The option E is also valid as this is not linked to the official's prediction.
Population is the right answer
The answer to this question is Asexual.
Up to this day, many experts still argue whether the cause of asexuality is simply psychological condition that just happen ever since that person born, or whether it's caused by potential damage that happens in our nervous system that drives pleasures when we experience sexual arousal.
Answer:
B) systematic observation
Explanation:
The options for this question are missing. The options are:
A) self-report
B) systematic observation
C) sampling behavior with tasks
D) interview
In research, the term systematic observation refers to a process to get data by which t<u>he researcher makes observations of the subjects of the study in an objective way</u>, not considering the researcher own prejudices by collecting data without biases from the researcher (which would come from the interpretation of the observations).
In this example Irina watches 10 babies once a month from birth to 2 years of age and writes down the sounds they make and the words they use. We can see that <u>she is observing the babies in an objective and close way and by writing down the sounds and words she is actually taking an objective measure of language development</u>. Therefore this would be an example of systematic observation.
