Because they both wanted land and resources.
have a good day!!
:)
<span>In the mid-17th
century of Britain, the Navigation Acts was established. These acts was made
mainly for safeguarding English shipping, and ensuring profit from the colonies.
The British Government added many taxes such as Tea Act, Quartering Act, Stamp
Act, etc. without allowing the participation of the Thirteen colonies. The Loyalist
Point of View was that the British government needed funds and to get these funds,
Britain must acquire it from international sales coming from the Thirteen
colonies. The will buy as many goods as they can so that when war comes, the colonies will have
lots of money instead of goods, this idea made the colonies furious. The Patriotist
point of view that all Thirteen colony goods must only be purchased from the
Britain even if the goods were expensive.</span>
Answer:
Explanation:
Around the 15th century, European nations and explorers were interest in foreign expeditions because of the 3 G's:
These countries wanted to become wealthy off of new markets, gold, and other resources (Gold). They hoped to spread their religion and evangelize new people (God). Finally, these nations wanted as much power and land as possible, plus individual explorers hoped to become glorified heroes (Glory).
However, they were <em>not</em> interested in learning about new cultures. In fact, they often did the opposite and disregarded or trampled on other cultures during colonization and Christianizing efforts.
So, the best answer is A. To learn about new cultures
The answer is <u>"functionalist perspective".</u>
According to the functionalist perspective of sociology, every part of society is related and adds to society's soundness and working in general.
Functionalists trust that society is held together by social accord, in which individuals from the general public concur upon, and cooperate to accomplish, what is best for society in general.
Functionalism does not urge individuals to play a functioning job in changing their social condition, notwithstanding when such change may profit them.
