Well first we need to change the format of the equations to slope-intercept, or y=mx+b.
So the first one (x + y < 1) will be changed to y < -x + 1.
The second one (2y ≥ x - 4) will be changed to y <span>≥ x/2 - 2.
Now we can analyze each graph.
In every single graph the first equation (y < -x + 1) is graphed correctly.
Now for the second equation, we can see that only the first and last graph correctly format to the equation.
Now for the shading:
The first equation shows us that y is less than -x +1, making the shading go under the dotted line. (to the left)
The second equation shows us that y is greater than or equal to x/2 - 2, making the shading go above the line. (also to the left)
Therefore, when we shade, the overlapping shading is correctly formatted in the first graph.
Hope this helped, comment any questions you have for me.</span>
Answer:
1st- what scenario are talking about?
2nd- false, becuase if you hide under any objects there is the risk of it falling over you and hurting you
Answer:
132600
Step-by-step explanation:
I was always taught like this, and this should be the best estimate:
28 x 4417 --> 30 * 4420 --> 132600
Some other possible estimates with simpler values:
30 * 4400 --> 132000
30 * 4500 --> 135000
30 * 4000 --> 120000
Answer:
1. 40%
2. The theoretical probability is 3% greater than the experimental probability.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are informed that a number cube is rolled 20 times and the number 4 is rolled 8 times. The experimental probability of rolling a 4 is;
(the number of times a 4 was rolled)/(total number of rolls)
8/20 = 0.4
0.4*100 = 40%
The experimental probability of obtaining at least one tails, one or more tails, is represented in mathematical notation as;
P(HT or TH or TT)
The above events are mutually exclusive, thus;
P(HT or TH or TT) = P(HT) + P(TH) + P( TT)
= (22+34+16)/(28+22+34+16)
= 0.72 = 72%
On the other hand, the theoretical probability of obtaining at least one tails,
P(HT or TH or TT) = 3/4
= 75%
This is because there is at least one tail in 3 out of 4 possible outcomes.
Therefore, it is true to say that the theoretical probability is 3% greater than the experimental probability.
Power=work/time
Fd/t=P
Pt/F=d
therefore, the answer is A
