Answer:
The correct answer is option B.
Explanation:
During the period of slowdown in the US economy, the government announced a program of tax rebates. This program classifies as a discretionary policy as it is planned by the government.
Tax rebates will lead to an increase in the disposable income of the consumer. This will cause the demand for goods to increase and further lead to an increase in consumer spending.
This is an example of an expansionary policy.
Answer:
The atoms or molecules bond closer together.
Explanation:
The gas molecules are free and float around whereas liquid atoms are bonded but are able to move freely as long as they are touching each other. These two substances are different to a solid substance because the molecules or atoms will not not be tightly bound together.
The theory of delegate representation is best illustrated by "my job to present the people who elected me regardless of my point of view".
<h3>Who is a delegate?</h3>
This refers to a assigned person to represent a society, region etc as a representative in a political convention.
Hence, a delegate representation is expected to say that my job to present the people who elected me regardless of my point of view.
Therefore, the Option B is correct.
Read more about delegate
<em>brainly.com/question/4889839</em>
#SPJ1
Crèvecoeur omits the many waffling people in the middle, who wanted to stay home on their farms rather than shed blood for either side
Explanation:
John de Crèvecoeur is French born American who had done many roles in his life term like he was farmer and very good writer. In his Letter from an American Farmer he narrated the life style of American in the period of 18th century. His narration is extremely based on the how America transformed from the old thoughts and how the people has accustomed to the various races of people settled over there. He was the keen observer of the revolution and narrated his thoughts in the “Letter from an American Farmer”. While do so he has omitted the waffling people of middle who were not involved themselves in the revolution rather they were do their farming activities.
Answer: ethical lapse
Explanation:
An ethical lapse is an error or mistake in judgement that an individual commits which brings about a harmful outcome. It is usually as a result of an oversight as it really doesn't mean that the individual lacks integrity.
The scenario in the question is an ethical lapse. This is because the extra $25 she pocketed wasn't accounted for as it was an oversight and it wasn't that she intentionally stole the $25 or didn't account for it intentionally.
