Answer:
B is the correct option.
Explanation:
This principle follows the assumption that a company will remain in business in the future. It means that the business will not have to halt operations or to liquidate the assets in the future. According to this principle, the accountant postpones the recognition of some expenses till a later period, and in that period the company will be in business will be effectively using the assets. It is a very important concept, without this, the company will not be able to prepay the expenses.
Dressing to impress for interviews would typically involve wearing professional dress in order to look smart and presentable.
<h2>Bob has to follow some of the listed tips (not exhaustive) in addition to the due diligence he has done about his employer. </h2>
Some of the options he has would include:
- A suit, jacket and tie
- A semi-formal trousers and a shirt
- Sweater and necktie.
Dressing properly for interviews would put Bob in a better light as it shows he is serious about the job. It also shows he is interested in the position, and finally demonstrates an understanding of the company's corporate culture.
Learn more about #interviews and #dress codes here: brainly.com/question/15128068?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
economic responsibility.
Explanation:
Layton has decided to donate a portion if his business Music Box earning's to a charity every year. His action of making donation decision is of economic responsibility. The decision is made to help out community in a good faith and is considered as social responsibility as Layton does not have any legal responsibility to make charity but still he decides to serve the society through his business earnings.
Answer: option 3
Explanation:
Background to the case:
The cases involving the explosion of Ford Pinto's due to a defective fuel system design led to the debate of many issues, most centering around the use by Ford of a cost-benefit analysis and the ethics surrounding its decision not to upgrade the fuel system based on this analysis.
Basis of analysis:
Should a risk/benefit analysis be used in situations where a defect in manufacturing could lead to seriously bodily harm and even worse death, such as in the Ford Pinto situation?
Rule of the court:
There hasn’t really been a definite decision about the case and arguments both for and against such an analysis have been made. It is an economically efficient method which has been accepted by courts for numerous years, however, juries may not always agree, so companies should take this into account.
Discretion is expected to be used.
Answer:
the answer is c...employees need 2 b compensated 4 a job that is satisfactory 2 a company.., this position to workers, relays a feeling of "job well done"
