Answer: The unintended, undesirable effect is morally tolerable if it brings a good result.
Explanation: The doctrine (or principle) of double effect is often invoked to explain the permissibility of an action that causes a serious harm.
According to the principle of double effect, sometimes it is permissible to cause a harm as a side effect (or “double effect”) of bringing about a good result even though it would not be permissible to cause such a harm as a means to bringing about the same good end.
Others, such as traders and moneylenders often referred to as Vaishyas were placed after them. Then came peasants, and artisans such as weavers and potters referred to as Shudras.
Answer:
Asset misappropriation.
Explanation:
Asset misappropriation is the most common type of fraud that people does. It is an fraudulent activity which occurs when any property of the company is stolen or is misused for some personal use.
In the context, two of the employees did fraud by not paying for the food they had. Payment of food at the office canteen was made though a kiosk and it was honorary. Such an example of fraud is called asset misappropriation.
Yes, please post the questions you need help with.
this is the closest answer I found. sorry if it's useless
