1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
serg [7]
3 years ago
9

(CORRECT ANSWER GETS BRAINLIEST) Drag each object to show whether distance is proportional to time in the situation represented.

Mathematics
2 answers:
Vinvika [58]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Distance is proportial to time

The two images or graphs  

Distance is NOT proportial to time

a truck passing through 4 cities at a constant speed.

a dog jogging at a constant speed for 20 min

Not enough information

a person running down a field to score a touchdown.

A horse running around a race track.  

Step-by-step explanation:

Both of the graphs are proportial to time, because time is a needed factor and as time changes so does distance.

The two statements stating a constant are not proportial to time because time is a constant therefore it doesnt change.

The last two staements dont have enough information on either time or distance so they get catorgorizied accordingly!

I hope this helps, if it does please mark brainliest! Thank you!! Have a great day!! If you have any more questions on this problem, feel free to ask :)

natka813 [3]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

a horse running around a race track and

a person running down a field to score a touchdown

DONT HAVE ENOUGH INFORMATION

the two graphs are proportional to time and

a dog jumping at a constant speed for 20min and

a truck passing through 4 cities at a constant speed are not proportional to time because they are constant

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in
Which number is greater 65% or 0.56
coldgirl [10]
65% is bigger than 0.56 which would be 56%
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Simplify without exponents.<br> 1/3(3^-2 3^5)
Over [174]
1/3 x (3^-2  x  3^5)
1/3 x (1/3^2 x 243)
1/3 x (1/9 x 243)
1/3 x 27
9
5 0
3 years ago
The dimensions of the following matrix M are 2 x 3.<br><br><br><br> True<br> False
Lostsunrise [7]

Answer:

true, refer to picture for more understanding :)

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
139°<br> (17x + 3)<br> answer
nasty-shy [4]

Answer:

x= 8

Step-by-step explanation:

17x + 3 = 139

17x = 136

x = 8

6 0
3 years ago
Helpppppppp as soon as possible
Levart [38]

Answer:

pandemic, epidemic.

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • 7/8 decided by 3/8 I will give you crown
    11·2 answers
  • How to show my daughter to do this and it needs to be changed to a mix number.
    11·1 answer
  • The bases of an isosceles trapezoid are represented by 4x and 2x.. The height of the trapezoid is represented by (x − 6). Which
    9·2 answers
  • A ladybug's length measures 2cm. Express this measurements in meters. Explan your thinking
    10·1 answer
  • Which classification best describes ∠2?
    7·2 answers
  • Kim has worked at the front desk of a hotel for 3 years. She earns $14.50 an hour and works 40 hours a week for 48 weeks a year.
    11·2 answers
  • Calculate the estimate of the mean height of the students in cm and explain your answer
    10·1 answer
  • Triangle KLM is translated to units right and one unit up to create triangle KLM which rule describes the transformation
    8·1 answer
  • Y = 15 when x = 60, find y when x = 45
    6·1 answer
  • Can some please help with this
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!