Often on television shows and in articles I see it mentioned that it'd always be bad to blow up an asteroid or comet because then the energy would just be spread out and cause even more damage.
According to some estimates I've seen around 100 tons (or more) of meteoroids hit the Earth each day. If all of this were combined together into a single asteroid, it could destroy an entire, large city.
Given that alone, it makes it seem to me that it be more logical to take the chance and blow up an asteroid and thereby trim its weight down, causing a lot more to be more easily burnt up on entry, so that when it did hit, it would cause less damage.
Is this logical at all? If my science/math/physics is incorrect, I want to understand why having more burn up by spreading out is worse compared to having it more concentrated and vastly more dangerous.
Answer:
Competition in science is when two or more organisms compete for resources such as food, water, or shelter.
Explanation:
Can I have brainliest? It would help me out, if not thanks anyways! Please tell me if you need me to elaborate more or show work!! I hope this helped and have a nice day!
Answer:
QUESTION:
Why do the chromosomes line up in the middle of the cell?
ANSWER:
Chromosomes line up at the metaphase plate, under tension from the mitotic spindle. The two sister chromatids of each chromosome are captured by microtubules from opposite spindle poles. In metaphase, the spindle has captured all the chromosomes and lined them up at the middle of the cell, ready to divide.
Explanation:
Hope that this helps you out! :)
Have a great rest of your day/night!
The answer is, A. Monophyletic.
<span>C.there is a prominent primary root from which secondary roots branch out
hope this helps
A taproot is the main root of the system, in which other roots spread out from it.</span>