Answer:
NM > LN
Step-by-step explanation:
Here, we want to write an inequality
we should beat it in mind that, the greater the angle that a side of a triangle faces, the greater its length will be relatively
as we can see, the side NM faces the greater angle of 83, relative to the side LN that faces the angle of 56;
So we can conclude that;
NM > LN
The perimeter of a square is the sum of its sides and they
are all equal, so to obtain the length of each of them we divide the perimeter
of the first fence between 4:
P1= 64 feet/4 sides
P1= 16 feet
Then, the length of each side of the second fence will
increase 2 feet at each end, as shown in the figure. We have then that the
perimeter of the second fence is:
P2 = 20 feet x 4 sides
P2 = 80 feet
The sum of the perimeters of both fences is:
PT = P1 + P2
PT = 64 feet + 80 feet
PT = 144 feet
Total cost = 1.17 $ x 144 feet
Total cost = 168.48 $
The total cost of the fences was $ 168.48
Answer:
Triangle 1 -
(if they want simplest radical form) or 5.4 (if they want to the nearest tenth)
Triangle 2- i couldnt figure this one out- may not be true
Pythagorean Theorem is... C) true for all right triangles
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
your answer is C.
Step-by-step explanation:
Why would she be paying for another form of currency is the real question?