Answer:
See Explanation
Step-by-step explanation:
a) Additive inverse of −2
- the additive inverse of a number a is the number that, when added to 'a', yields zero. This number is also known as the opposite (number), sign change, and negation.
- So the Additive inverse of -2 is 2. ∴ -2+2=0
b) Additive identity of −5
- Additive identity is the value when added to a number, results in the original number. When we add 0 to any real number, we get the same real number.
- -5 + 0 = -5. Therefore, 0 is the additive identity of any real number.
c) additive inverse of 3
- Two numbers are additive inverses if they add to give a sum of zero. 3 and -3 are additive inverses since 3 + (-3) = 0. -3 is the additive inverse of 3.
d). multiplicative identity of 19
- an identity element (such as 1 in the group of rational numbers without 0) that in a given mathematical system leaves unchanged any element by which it is multiplied
- Multiplicative identity if 19 is 1 only, since 19 x 1 = 19.
e) multiplicative inverse of 7
- Dividing by a number is equivalent to multiplying by the reciprocal of the number. Thus, 7 ÷7=7 × 1⁄7 =1. Here, 1⁄7 is called the multiplicative inverse of 7.
d) | 11-5|×|1-5|
- | 11-5|×|1-5| ⇒ I6I×I-4I ⇒ 6×4 ⇒ 24
504÷1800=0.28
28% of her income goes to her rent
That's for the equation I got from the picture
Answer:
Most of the men's shoes in the data set cost more than women's shoes.
Step-by-step explanation:
From what I could tell it can't be The price of men's shoes has a higher interquartile range than that of women's shoes. becuse that's false what looks to fit is Most of the men's shoes in the data set cost more than women's shoes. since on the graph more of the mens vaules are bigger
