Answer:
A gain would be less or a loss would be greater using straight-line depreciation.
Explanation:
Let me put amount in the question. Let the value of the fixed asset be $100,000.
Under the straight line depreciation method the annual depreciation amount for the 5 year period will be = $100,000/5 = $20,000 per year.
Depreciation rate = (depreciation amount)/(value of fixed asset) x 100%
= 20000/100000 x 100%
= 20%
Now accumulated depreciation at the end of 2nd year = 2 multiply by 20,000 = $40,000
Book value = $100,000 - $40,000 = $60,000
With the double-declining balance method, the depreciation rate = 2 multiply by straight line rate = 2x20% = 40%
Year Opening book value Depreciation Ending book value
1 100,000.00 40,000.00 60,000.00
2 60,000.00 24,000.00 36,000.00
Total accummulated depreciation$64,000.00
With the double declining balance method the accumulated depreciation amount is $64,000 and book value = $36,000.00
If the fixed asset is sold for $70,000 after 2 years then the gain as per the straight line method = $70,000 - $60,000 = $10,000. And in case of double declining balance method, the gain = $70,000 - $36,000 = $34,000. Double declining method will have a greater gain.
Expenses too will be affected differently. In case of straight line method the amount of expenses will be lower than double declining balance method as in case of double declining balance method the amount of depreciation expenses will be higher during the initial years.