Well, before you start, you need to choose a side. If you are confused on the phrasing, it is simply asking:
Do you agree that the Supreme Court should be able to think of the law differently during a case to fit with current views?
After that, start thinking of why.
Yes, they should, the Founding Fathers wrote the Constitution to change as societal views changed.
No, they shouldn't, just because societal views are changing, what we need for our country to run smoothly is the same as it has been,
Hope I could help!
Answer: Randomly audit EHR documentation for patients readmitted within 30 days.
Explanation: To determine if hospital policies are being followed, a random judicial examination of electronic health records (EHR) is the best. This is because the probability of getting an accurate result is high since it's just a random sample.
Answer:
They are designed to help people get along with one another, prevent accidents, make sure resources are used fairly. If the people do not obey the laws; our government cannot maintain order, protect our health, safety, and property.
Answer:
Group A did not work as hard or as well as group B and would be less likely to spontaneously work on similar puzzles in the future.
Explanation:
Over justification, effect is a psychological phenomenon where people tend to lose interest in an activity when intrinsic motivation is replaced by extrinsic rewards. person not only lose interest in an activity but less likely to engage in that activity. people tend to see that external reward as bribe to do that activity which was earlier they were doing for internal appeasement.
As per the question Group A is externally motivated to do work, it would unlikely that they engage in such a similar activity in the future.
A concern shared by a group of people on which they have not yet chosen to act collaboratively is called. a latent interest.
