Answer:
Laura's lawsuit against Bolivia will most likely not prevail because of the Act of state doctrine.
Explanation:
According to this Act, a sovereign state (United States) must respect the independence of any other sovereign state (Bolivia) and, as a result, all the laws and regulations that such sovereign state sets forth. If no US dollars are allowed to enter Bolivia, US citizens traveling to such country have to change US dollars for "Bolivianos", which is the currency used in Bolivia.
In addition, a court (a US court in this case) is not entitled to hear a case where a foreign issue is involved (the fact of exchanging foreign currency). This case cannot be heard nor decided by a US court because that would interfere with the US foreign policy (with Bolivia in this case).
Recognition is the measure of memory used on a test that requires matching terms with correct definitions.
Answer:
The States were less centralized, the federal government of the states had less power, meaning it was harder to get all the states on the same page as opposed to the United States where all the states are free but still have to answer and comply with overall federal government.
Explanation:
Found on this site (brainly)
a. It has lasted over 200 years.
b.It can be amended.
c. It defines all of the laws of the land.
d. It takes the place of state constitutions.
The constitution refers to a body of fundamental principles and established precedents according to which a country is governed. A constitution is described as a working document due to the fact it can be amended. New laws can be added to it and laws that are deem unsuitable can be modify or remove. Thus, the correct option is B.
Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/7288367#readmore
Exploring the frontier, he did a lot of exploring in his time, and is most known for it
