1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Marat540 [252]
3 years ago
11

1/3 of 2 feet=(?)inches1/6 of 3 yards=(?)inches​

Mathematics
1 answer:
melomori [17]3 years ago
5 0

Problem 1

1 ft = 12 inches

2 ft = 24 inches (multiply both sides by 2)

Multiply by 1/3 to get (1/3)*24 = 24/3 = 8

<h3>Answer: 8 inches</h3>

========================================

Problem 2

1 yard = 3 feet

3 yards = 9 feet (multiply both sides by 3)

1 ft = 12 inches

9 ft = 108 inches (multiply both sides by 9)

so overall, 3 yards = 108 inches

Multiply this by 1/6

(1/6)*(108 inches) = 108/6 = 18 inches

<h3>Answer: 18 inches</h3>

note: 18 inches = 12 inches + 6 inches = 1 ft, 6 inches = 1.5 ft

You might be interested in
How many different triangles can you make with the following conditions: angles measuring 45 degrees and 90 degrees and an INCLU
kotykmax [81]

Answer:

One

Step-by-step explanation:

Clearly, one triangle can be constructed as the angles 45 and 90 do not exceed 180 degrees. (so "None" is not correct)

To show that only one such triangle exists, you can apply the Angle-Side-Angle theorem for congruence.

Since one triangle can be constructed, it remains to be shown that no additional triangle that is not congruent to the first one can be created: I will use proof by contradiction. Let a triangle ABC be constructed with two angles 45 and 90 degree and one included side of length 1 inch. Suppose, I now construct a second triangle that is different from the first one but still has the same two angles and included side. By applying the ASA theorem which states that two triangles with same two angles and one side included are congruent, I must conclude that my triangle is congruent to the first one. This is a contradiction, hence my original claim could not have been true. Therefore, there is no way to construct any additional triangle that would not be congruent with the first one, and only one such triangle exists.

3 0
3 years ago
What’s the answer ??
labwork [276]
Pretty Sure Its B I had this question Too
4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
WHY IS MATH SO COMPLICATED?!
Tomtit [17]
Closed dot on 53, arrow going to the right
6 0
3 years ago
Which of the following sets of numbers could be the lengths of the sides of a triangle? A. 12 in., 24 in., 48 in.B. 12 in., 6 in
bearhunter [10]
C. And it would be a equilateral
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Simplify 26-18b+11(b-3)
xxMikexx [17]

Answer:

<u>-7b-7</u>

Step-by-step explanation:

First you have to distribute 11 throughout the parentheses.

26-18b+11(b-3)\\26-18b+11b-33

Now we can combine like terms. (-18b, 11b, -33, 26)

-18b+ 11b  and -33+26

-7b-7

This is your simplified answer for your expression.

<u>-7b-7</u>

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Jamie's hand is 6 inches wide when she stretches her fingers out. What portion of a foot is this? Express your answer as a decim
    7·1 answer
  • State the domain and range of the following relation.
    7·2 answers
  • One more than four times a number b is 17
    5·2 answers
  • Which one of them has no solution
    15·1 answer
  • John has 48 square centimeter tiles he wants to use to
    13·2 answers
  • Find 3/8 of 56. <br><br> Plz help
    7·1 answer
  • I need help on this one help hurry
    12·1 answer
  • A line with a slope of 0 contains the point (3,4) . The point -2,? is also on the line. What is the missing y-coordinate?
    15·1 answer
  • The x and y intercepts for this equation plz y=−1/4x+2<br> (_,_)
    7·1 answer
  • 3 (h−9) + 2h = h − 27 + 4h
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!