According to liquidity preference theory, a drop-off in money demand for some ground other than a change in the price degree causes The interest rate to go down, so the aggregate demand shifts.
<h3>What is aggregate demand?</h3>
The total amount of goods and services produced in an economy is the measurement of the aggregate demand.
The aggregate demand is shown as the total amount of money is exchanged at the particular price level and point in time.
Thus, The interest rate to go down,
For more details about aggregate demand, click here:
brainly.com/question/13000505
#SPJ4
now suppose that the government immediately pursues an accommodative policy by increasing government purchases in response to the short run economic impact of the higher oil prices <u>The output will be $billion and the price level will increase.</u>
<h3>What is
accommodative policy?</h3>
When a central bank (like the Federal Reserve) tries to increase the general money supply to support the economy when growth is stalling, this is known as accommodating monetary policy, often known as loose credit or easy monetary policy (as measured by GDP). The goal of the policy is to allow the money supply to increase in step with both the demand for money and national revenue.
- The expansion of the money supply by central banks to stimulate the economy is known as accommodating monetary policy.
- The Federal funds rate has been decreased as part of monetary policies that are deemed accommodating.
- The goals of these policies are to lower the cost of borrowing money and boost consumer spending.
To learn more about accommodative policy from the given link:
brainly.com/question/14245561
#SPJ4
<h3><u /></h3>
Answer:
The answer is: Alais will prevail because of material breach of the contract
Explanation:
Material breach in contract law refers to one party failing to perform under the contract significantly enough so that the aggrieved party has the right to sue for breach of contract.
In this case when Rutherford failed to perform, Alais sustained enough "damage" that enables her to sue Rutherford. She probably was no longer able to finish her job in time.
Answer:
no cash was collected during the period
or
cash collections during the year are less than the amount of revenue recognized
Explanation:
For example if we had Accounts receivable beginning balance $ 250,000 and Sales of $ 500,000 are made on accounts then the Total Accounts receivable will be $ 750,000.
But out of the $ 500,000 sales only $300,00 cash is collected and the remaining $ 200,000 is still in the Accounts receivable balance so the ending Accounts receivable balance will be $ 250,000 + $200,000 = $ 450,000 which will be greater than beginning Accounts receivable balance.
So there are two possibilities either cash collections during the year are less than the amount of revenue recognized.
or
no cash was collected during the period.
Similarly it cannot be choice no 1 : collections during the period exceed the amount of revenue recognized
Because if more cash is collected then ending account receivable balance would be less than the beginning account receivable balance.
Choice no 3 is also wrong if cash collections are more than the ending accounts receivable balance would be less
Answer:
$9,000
Explanation:
The cash flow statement is the financial statement where the cash flows from the various activities of a business are recorded. These activities include Operating, Investing and Financing. The statement may be shown using gthe direct or indirect method.
The operating activities include the changes to current assets and liabilities. Increases in assets (apart from cash) represents an out flow of cash while increases in liability represents and in flow of cash and vice versa.
The net cash flows from operating activities using the indirect method
= -5000 - 20,000 + 10,000 + 25,000 - 1,000 (all amounts in $)
= $9,000
This represents a net inflow.