Answer:
3 years
Explanation:
The computation of the time period is shown below
Present value of annuity = Annuity × [1 - (1 + interest rate)^-time period] ÷ rate
$2,000 = $734.42 × [1 - (1.05)^-n] ÷ 0.05
$2,000 = $14,688.4 × [1-(1.05)^-n]
1-(1.05)^-n = ($2000 ÷ $14,688.4)
(1.05)^-n = 1 - ($2000 ÷ $14,688.4)
( 1 ÷ 1.05)^n = 0.86383813
Now take the log to the both sides
n × log(1 ÷ 1.05) = log0.86383813
n = log0.86383813 ÷ log (1 ÷ 1.05)
= 3 years
Answer:
The answer might be option no C
Answer:
Both parties experience surplus, but there is inequity because Steve has a much larger producer surplus
Explanation:
The options to this question wasn't provided. Here are the options : Both parties experience surplus, but there is inequity because Steve has a much larger producer surplus. Both parties experience surplus, so the transaction was equitable. Only Steve benefits from the sale. Srivani will not be happy with her purchase.
Consumer surplus is the difference between the willingness to pay of a consumer and the price of the good.
Producer surplus is the difference between the price of a good and the least amount the seller is willing to sell his good.
While both parties earn a surplus, the producer surplus exceeds the consumer surplus . Therefore, the seller benefited more from the trade than the consumer.
I hope my answer helps you
Answer:
C. workers with more years of formal schooling are less likely to be affected by ability, effort, and chance.
Explanation:
The <em>signalling theory in education</em> tells us that employees send "signals" to their employees regarding their education. In other words, employers are willing to pay higher wages to employees with additional years of formal schooling.
This means these qualified workers have their wage primarily defined by their education level, which does not always reflect their true skill-set (the output of ability and effort).
Answer:
The answer is: a
Explanation:
The Parton Company has a 'make or buy' decision. This decision involves analysing the incremental costs associated with each option. Incremental costs are costs incurred as a result of producing one more unit of a product. If the excess capacity can be utilised to produce the headlights at a lower cost than the cost of acquiring the headlights from an external supplier, then the company should produce the headlights.
The Parton Company incurs $12.80 per headlight purchased from the external supplier. Added to this cost, are the existing costs of operating below plant capacity. If making the headlights in the manufacturing plant yields a positive contribution to fixed costs, then the Parton company should produce the headlights in the manufacturing plant.
By producing the headlights, the Parton company gains a contribution to fixed costs of $1.03 per headlight.
Foregone purchase costs from supplier: $12.80
Incurred costs (directly) from production: ($11.77)
Direct materials ($4.45)
Direct Labour ($3.45)
Manufacturing Overheads: $(6.45*0.6) <u>($3.87)</u>
Net gain per headlight <u> </u><u>$1.03</u>
