I assume you mean one that is not rational, such as √2. In such a case, you make a reasonable estimate of it's position, and then label the point that you plot.
For example, you know that √2 is greater than 1 and less than 2, so put the point at about 1½ (actual value is about 1.4142).
For √3, you know the answer is still less than 4, but greater than √2. If both of those points are required to be plotted just make sure you put it in proper relation, otherwise about 1¾ is plenty good (actual value is about 1.7321).
If you are going to get into larger numbers, it's not a bad idea to just learn a few roots. Certainly 2, 3, and 5 (2.2361) and 10 (3.1623) shouldn't be too hard.
Then for a number like 20, which you can quickly workout is √4•√5 or 2√5, you could easily guess about 4½ (4.4721).
They're usually not really interested in your graphing skills on this sort of exercise. They just want you to demonstrate that you have a grasp of the magnitude of irrational numbers.
Well I don't know.
Let's think about it:
-- There are 6 possibilities for each role.
So 36 possibilities for 2 rolls.
Doesn't take us anywhere.
New direction:
-- If the first roll is odd, then you need another odd on the second one.
-- If the first roll is even, then you need another even on the second one.
This may be the key, right here !
-- The die has 3 odds and 3 evens.
-- Probability of an odd followed by another odd = (1/2) x (1/2) = 1/4
-- Probability of an even followed by another even = (1/2) x (1/2) = 1/4
I'm sure this is it. I'm a little shaky on how to combine those 2 probs.
Ah hah !
Try this:
Probability of either 1 sequence or the other one is (1/4) + (1/4) = 1/2 .
That means ... Regardless of what the first roll is, the probability of
the second roll matching it in oddness or evenness is 1/2 .
So the probability of 2 rolls that sum to an even number is 1/2 = 50% .
Is this reasonable, or sleazy ?
The simplified form of the expression is 3
<h3>Simplifying an Expression</h3>
From the question, we are to simplify the given expression
The given expression is
53 -2(16/8 * 16-7)
Simplifying
Using BODMAS
53 -2(16/8 × 16-7)
53 -2(2 × 16-7)
53 -2(32-7)
53 -2(25)
53 -50
= 3
Hence, the simplified form of the expression is 3
Learn more on Simplifying an Expression here: brainly.com/question/3622770
#SPJ1
Division using multiples of 10 is different than how most of us learned how to divide. <span>The idea of multiple is what number can 10 go into without a remainder. That is easy. Ten ends in a zero. Thus 10 goes into numbers ending in zero. An example is 60. Ten ends in a zero; 60 ends in a zero. It will divide evenly. </span>
Answer:
3w+7=9
Step-by-step explanation:
i need at least 20 characters so I just rote this
