i think it would be C the reason for this is being that the definition of a quota is a limit on trade,and the question is asking for a way to limit it. an embargo limits all trade between a country, and a tariff raises the tax on trade and why would you want to decrease the safety standards? these are my reasons for it being : C. A quota on imports and exports
hope this helps
The first direct evidence of primitive cellular life was the 1977 discovery of <u>microbial </u>fossils in the swartkoppie chert, a type of granular sedimentary rock rich in silica.
Some of Earth's high-quality-preserved fossil microorganisms occur in rocks from the Ediacaran period of geologic time, which runs from about 635 to 541 million years ago. Scientists do not absolutely apprehend how this fragile microorganism became fossils. however, a new experimental look at is now dropping more mild.
Some microorganisms secrete iron-coated sheaths that on occasion fossilize. Others may additionally bore into shells or rocks and shape microscopic canals in the shell; such microorganisms are referred to as endolithic, and their borings can be identified at some point of the Phanerozoic.
The earliest regarded fossils on the planet are putative fossilized microorganisms determined in hydrothermal vent precipitates, taken into consideration to be about three.42 billion years old.
Learn more about fossils here: brainly.com/question/11829803
#SPJ4
Answer:
U.S. Constitution
The Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause requires states to practice equal protection. Equal protection forces a state to govern impartially—not draw distinctions between individuals solely on differences that are irrelevant to a legitimate governmental objective.
Conflict theorists would contend that changes in the male-female power relationship explain the high divorce rates in the united states. It <span> is a theory propounded by </span>Karl Marx<span> that claims society is in a state of perpetual conflict due to competition for limited resources.</span>
Personally, I believe that differing political views result in greater political participation because of a persons need to help the side they support win. Take this for example: Republican and democratic parties have come to an issue where they see two completely different solutions. The republicans are scared that if they don't have great amounts of participation, the democrats will win and the democrats are scared of they don't have great amounts of participation, the republicans will win. This need to help the idea they support win drives a greater amount of political participation form both sides and is applicable to any differing political views. Hope this helps! :)
