1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nydimaria [60]
3 years ago
13

The Renaissance encouraged people to:

History
1 answer:
daser333 [38]3 years ago
6 0
Worry less about religion and more about what they could do(humanism)
You might be interested in
What was the primary goal of the dawes act of 1887 regarding native america indians
Pavlova-9 [17]

The Dawes Act of 1887 (also known as the General Allotment Act or the Dawes Severalty Act of 1887), authorized the President of the United States to survey American Indian tribal land and divide it into allotments for individual Indians.

:) hope i helped..

-Blue


8 0
3 years ago
How did the leaders agree to divide Germany?
kupik [55]
The French were control the area where many Germans and other people spoke in French or know some French. The Russians would control the Eastern part of Germany which they conquered and had more of the Slavic type of people. The Brits and Americans took the rest.
4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the purpose of the Navigation Acts?
Sever21 [200]

the correct answer would be B-To reduce the growing strength of the colonies.  D is wrong

6 0
3 years ago
Write a 500 word essay answering the following questions.
german

Answer:

The Warren Court made decisions regarding segregation and civil liberties. The most famous court decision was Brown v. Board of Education which ended school segregation in America and began a wave of desegregation decisions. These decisions created uproar in the South and cause military intervention at times. Miranda v. Arizona was another famous Warren Court decision which better defined the Fifth Amendment and how a person must be informed on their rights when arrested. These cases were often racial in nature redefining civil liberties and due process of the law.Yes the Warren Court did exceed its boundaries in issuing some of its decisions during the 1960s. For example the court gave its decision regarding women suffrage and it was not taken well by many women of that time. Many women were forced to suffer the consequences of the decision given by the Warren Court in regards to women's suffrage.The Tonkin Gulf Resolution was a joint resolution which the United States Congress passed on August 7, 1964. It gave power to the president to use conventional military force without declaration of war. It basically gave more power to the president then checks and balances allow. In this case for the given question let us assume that it was the executive branch that had taken fore step and became more powerful. If such had happened the power resting upon the head of the society or the president would increase and the chances of being mistake in due to the presence of human emotions and flaws would come into action.  The decisions taken by the agencies would be biased and hence the laws that would be made would not necessarily benefits the society. When the US Constitution was written, the States feared a strong Federal Government. Because of the three branches system the US Constitution created a new system that revolutionized Constitutions around the world: the Checks and Balances system.  The Checks and Balances system is a system that the US Constitution created to give powers to each of those three branches to limit the power of the other branch. Each branch has typical and atypical powers, and those atypical powers are the ones that are used to limit the typical powers of other branches.  Because of that, if any of the three branches exceeds its authority the other branches have the power to stop this power and return the thing to status quo ante.  Example of this atypical powers is: The Power of Veto the President has, the Impeachment Power of the Congress and Power the judicial branch has to declare a law unconstitutional.  As you can notice, the Constitution created a system that autoregulates itself so that power and democracy are stable. The Warren Court has caused social change but one thing that the warren court has impacted positivily is that it broadened the individual rights of accused criminals. yes there is ups and downs to the warren court and it was a big thing in the 19th century but remembering on how of a impact it was has gave us importance today because any case that had segregation and enough evidence was presented, then a law for segregation would be unconstitutional.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!! How did Genghis Khan become the leader of the Mongol nation?
ZanzabumX [31]

Answer:

B??

Explanation:

tell me if im wrong..

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is the term for california state legislators
    15·1 answer
  • When man learned to write, to use metals, and to work with others we say he became?
    13·1 answer
  • Describe the greek idea of democracy
    13·1 answer
  • The Lemon test, enunciated by the Supreme Court in 1971 to determine whether government aid to parochial schools is constitution
    12·1 answer
  • For much of the early history of the American colonies, England chose a governing policy of salutary neglect. Why then would Eng
    14·2 answers
  • What nation was England's greatest rivalry?
    15·1 answer
  • What was a response among many latin american countries to the global repercussions of the great depression?
    15·1 answer
  • Both Jacques Cartier and Samuel de Champlain explored?
    15·1 answer
  • What aspect of the Commercial Revolution would bring discord between colonists and their mother countries?
    6·2 answers
  • Can someone plz help me?
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!