Answer: Tragedy of the commons
Explanation: Tragedy of the commons could simply be explained as the potential destruction or abuse of a communal resource which belongs to not one but group of people or a community due to unrestricted or unregulated access afforded to all members. The destruction or damage done is usually due to the self interest of members who are only guided by their own personal pursuit giving little or no regard to shared instruments, products, infrastructures or resources. In other to guard against 'tragedy of the commons' regulations and restrictions should be made to shield or protect shared resources.
Answer:
b. cyber fraud.
Explanation:
Cyber fraud: Th term cyber fraud refers to the act that involves the use of a computer by an individual to alter, change or take out the electronic data to gain or utilize an unlawful computer's access. The unlawful act of using a computer's data is proscribed as an abuse act, computer fraud, or cyber fraud.
Cyber fraud includes:
1. Identity Theft scams.
2. Cyberstalking.
3. Phishing scams.
4. Invasion of privacy.
5. Online Harassment.
In the question above, the statement signifies the cyber fraud.
It’s true, all organic molecules contain the element carbon
Answer:
safety and security
Explanation:
Safety and security needs: In psychology, the term "safety and security needs" is considered as one of the different stages or levels of needs in the hierarchy of needs theory which was proposed by a psychologist named Abraham Maslow.
According to him, safety and security needs are the second stage needs in an individual's life in which he or she wants to keep oneself or family safe and secure from any harm. It involves job security, shelter, and safe environments.
In the question above, the given statement represents safety and security needs.
The correct answer is Paraphrasing plagiarism
Explanation: This type of plagiarism is very common and is widely used by people, there are no major problems with this type of Paraphrasing plagiarism, the only problem is if the person in question does not grant due credits to the author of the original work.
