Answer:
The answer is: 4) More frequently than not, the three objectives are compatible.
Explanation:
Toyota is famous for its Just in Time (JIT) management. They are the absolute kings of efficient supply chain management and they were able to do it by making the three objectives compatible. That doesn't mean that they all have to be dealt with at the same time and with the same intensity.
Toyota's first goal was to reduce costs and in order to reduce costs they had to increase their inventory turnover. Then they discovered that in order to keep increasing inventory turnover, they had to compress their cycle time. When they were able to compress their cycle time, their turnover increased even more and their costs were lowered. The system produces continuous feedback and their efficiency keeps increasing.
I once visited one of their factories that produces almost 500 pickup trucks per day and every single work station had available inventory for only 4 trucks; only 4 engines, 16 doors, etc. It is amazing how they do it considering that every 3 minutes one truck is fully produced.
The three objectives are not only compatible, but they are absolutely necessary for the SCM to be effective.
Answer:
$582,100
Explanation:
Cost of land $570,000
Less;Salvage parts sold ($23,000)
Demolition of old building $33,000
Land preparation and leveling $2,100
Total cost of land $582,100
The ground breaking ceremony expenses are not capital expenditures therefore ignored in above working.
C aggregate demand shocks
Play little or no role in the economy in the short run
Answer:
Piazza should sue DGA Corporation because he (or she?) was struck by a company vehicle and the driver was acting within the scope of his normal employment tasks. Piazza might also sue Delaney along with DGA, since DGA is a small corporation and as a corporation is considered a separate legal entity whose shareholder equity might be really low.
Piazza can sue for compensatory damages including pain and suffering, medical bills and lost wages.
Answer:
The carrying value of the bonds immediately after the first interest payment is $434,300.
Explanation:
Face value of the bond = $440,000
Proceeds from bond issue = $434,000
Discount on bond payable = Face value of the bond - Proceeds from bond issue = $440,000 - $434,000 = $6,000
Total number of seminual = Number of years of bond maturity * Number of semiannual in a year = 10 * 2 = 20
Discount amortizaton per semiannual = Discount on bond payable / Total number of seminual = $6,000 / 20 = $300
Carrying value after first interest payment = Proceeds from bond issue + Discount amortizaton per semiannual = $434,000 + $300 = $434,300
Therefore, the carrying value of the bonds immediately after the first interest payment is $434,300.
