Answer:
Economy is always at the full employment level of output
Explanation:
The economy in a classical long-run supply model will always have the same economic output
Answer:
Attractions between molecules cause a reduction in volume
Explanation:
Answer:
We know that
ħf = ф + Ekmax
where
ħ = planks constant = 6.626x10^-34 J s
f = frequency of incident light = 1.3x10^15 /s (1 Hz =
1/s)
ф = work function of the cesium = 2.14 eV
Ekmax = max kinetic energy of the emmitted electron.
We distinguish that:
1 eV = 1.602x10^-19 J
So:
2.14 eV x (1.602x10^-19 J / 1 eV) = 3.428x10^-19 J
So,
Ekmax = (6.626x10^-34 J s) x (1.3x10^15 / s) - 3.428x10^-19 J
= 8.6138x10^-19 J - 3.428x10^-19 J = 5.1858x10^-19 J
Answer:
5.19x10^-19 J
Kinetic energy:
In physics, the kinetic energy of an object is the energy that it owns due to its motion. It is defined as the work required accelerating a body of a given mass from rest to its specified velocity. Having expanded this energy during its acceleration, the body upholds this kinetic energy lest its speed changes.
Answer details:
Subject: Chemistry
Level: College
Keywords:
• Energy
• Kinetic energy
• Kinetic energy of emitted electrons
Learn more to evaluate:
brainly.com/question/4997492
brainly.com/question/4010464
brainly.com/question/1754173
I've prepared some analysis and <span>cucumbers do have many comparable properties to potatoes, tomatoes, and lemons, all of which I know do work. So I would presume that cucumbers would also work. I would recommend trying it yourself to perceive. I'd love to hear the outcomes of your experiment. ;) </span>
Answer:
ΔH for formation of 197g Fe⁰ = 1.503 x 10³ Kj => Answer choice 'B'
Explanation:
Given Fe₂O₃(s) + 2Al⁰(s) => Al₂O₃(s) + 2Fe⁰(s) + 852Kj
197g Fe⁰ = (197g/55.85g/mol) = 3.527 mol Fe⁰(s)
From balanced standard equation 2 moles Fe⁰(s) => 852Kj, then ...
3.527 mole yield (a higher mole value) => (3.527/2) x 852Kj = 1,503Kj (a higher enthalpy value).
______
NOTE => If 2 moles Fe gives 852Kj (exo) as specified in equation, then a <u>higher energy value</u> would result if the moles of Fe⁰(s) is <u>higher than 2 moles</u>. The ratio of 3.638/2 will increase the listed equation heat value to a larger number because 197g Fe⁰(s) contains more than 2 moles of Fe⁰(s) => 3.527 mole Fe(s) in 197g. Had the problem asked for the heat loss from <u>less than two moles Fe⁰(s)</u> - say 100g Fe⁰(s) (=1.79mole Fe⁰(s)) - then one would use the fractional ratio (1.79/2) to reduce the enthalpy value less than 852Kj.
