The relationship is linear becuase it all equals each other
When the sign is ≤ or ≥ ("less/greater than <u>or equal to</u>"), the line is a solid line.
When the sign is < or >, the line is a dotted line.
The inequality will be similar to the slope intercept form:
y = mx + b
"m" being the slope, "b" being the y-intercept(when x = 0)
Except there is no equal sign.
The slope(m) can be found by using the slope formula, or:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9cb1a/9cb1af64ff3f347fbd5528df66aa9f8e440c20f2" alt="slope = \frac{rise}{run}"
Rise is the number of units you go up or down, run is the number of units you go to the right.
Based on the graph, you go up 2 units, and to the right 5 units. Your slope is 2/5. When x = 0, y is -1, so your y-intercept is -1.
y ? 2/5x - 1
The shaded area is below the line, this means that "y" is less than the equation (2/5x - 1)
Your inequality is:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d76f8/d76f823e04a752e879412b423f0aa86535e6592c" alt="y < \frac{2}{5}x - 1"
Ratios can be part-to-part, part-to-whole,<span> or </span>whole-to-part.<span> Let's take a look at what this means.</span>
When we compare boys to girls in a classroom, we are comparing part of the class to another part of the class. This would be a part-to-part comparison.
When we compare boys to the whole class, this is a <span>part-to-whole </span>comparison.
If we were to compare the class to the girls, this would be whole-to-part comparison.
EXAMPLE: A class is made up of 14 girls and 15 boys.
PART_TO_PART 14 : 15 shows girls to boys
PART_TO_WHOLE 14: 29 shows girls to the class
Whole-to-Part 29 : 14 shows the class to the girls
Answer:
Is there a picture so that i can understand it more
Step-by-step explanation: