Answer:
Cost of equity is 11.2%
WACC is 8.74%
Explanation:
The formula for cost of equity is given below:
Cost of equity=risk free rate+(Beta *risk premium)
risk free rate is the treasury bill rate of 4%
Beta is 0.9
market risk premium is 8%
cost of equity=4%+(0.9*8%)=11.2%
WACC=Ke*E/V+Kd*D/V*(1-t)
Ke is the cost of equity of 11.2%
Kd is the cost of debt of 5%
t is the tax rate of 40% or 0.4
E is the equity weighting of 70% or 0.7
D is the debt weighting of 30% or 0.3
V is the E+D=0.7+0.3=1
WACC=11.20%
*0.7/1+(5%*0.3/1*(1-0.4)
WACC=7.84%
+0.90%
=8.74%
Answer:
(i) 95 (F)
(ii) 125 (F)
(iii) 220 (Overapplied)
Explanation:
Variable Overhead Rate Variance:
= Actual Hours × (Actual Rate - Standard Rate)
= 1,900 × ($1.20 - $1.25)
= 95 (F)
Variable Overhead Efficiency Variance:
= Standard Rate × (Actual Hours - Standard Hours)
= $1.25 × (1,900 - 1 × 2,000)
= 125 (F)
Over- or Underapplied Variable Overhead:
= Actual Overhead Incurred - Overhead Applied
= (1,900 × $1.20) - (2,000 × $1.25)
= 220 (Overapplied)
In the context of the 5S principles, <u>sustain </u>means to keep a process going through training, communication, and organizational structures.
<h3>What is 5S principles? </h3>
5s principles can be defined as the principle that help to show the appropriate way a work place or work environment should be or should be arranges .
The 5S principle are:
- Sort
- Set in order
- Shine
- Standardize
- Sustain
Therefore In the context of the 5S principles, <u>sustain </u>means to keep a process going through training, communication, and organizational structures.
Learn more about 5s principles here:brainly.com/question/10001029
#SPJ1
Answer:
That she would be mad , hit them,
Answer:
The options for this question are the following:
A. current reality assessment
B. establish the mission
C. prepare values statement
D. maintain strategic control
The correct answer is A. current reality assessment
.
Explanation:
The current evaluation has been designed to evaluate competencies. In the new trends, two support centers can be found: one, focused on the critical review of education sciences in particular and social sciences in general and the other, more pragmatic, derived from the new challenges introduced by the progress dizzying of science and technology.
The traditional evaluation procedure responds to content-based education. It is based on forms of institutionalized obedience and tends to lead the educational process to the school routine and the use of coercive measures, thus impeding the search for critical and creative thinking.
