Answer: Both will raise the same amount
Explanation:
The government here is certain that it can achieve the same quantity and price regardless of if it uses a pollution tax or pollution allowance. This means that it would be charging the companies the same regardless of the method used.
Both methods would therefore yield the same amount if the government uses either of them.
Answer:
It will be reported as accrued expenses (c)
Explanation:
Accrued expenses represents amount owed for either serviced that has been enjoyed or goods that have been delivered but yet to be paid for.
Income statement is prepared on accrual basis, hence, these expenses will be recognized in the current period and matched with revenues generated.
<span>The question is incomplete, here is the complete question which I previously came across;</span>
When Janice went to work as a hair stylist in Rick's beauty shop, she entered into an agreement with Rick, whereby, if she left she would not work for another beauty shop within 50 miles for 2 years. Rick trained Janice in a number of new techniques. After nine months, Janice was offered a great job down the street at a new beauty shop, quit Rick, and had a number of customers follow her down the street to her new job. Rick claimed that she had signed a contract and had no right to go to work at the new shop. Janice disagreed and told Rick that no judge in the country would enforce such an agreement. Janice told Rick that she was more worried about a customer, Treena, who was threatening to sue her because her hair turned green after Janice worked on it. Janice agreed that Treena's hair was damaged. Janice pointed out, however, that she told Treena that odd results could result from a dye attempt, and she required that Treena sign a contract releasing Janice from all liabilities before she did anything with Treena's hair. Treena, however, sued anyway. The agreement Rick and Janice entered into is referred to as?
The answer is, the agreement Rick and Janice entered into is referred to as "<span>covenant not to compete".</span>
<span>
</span>
It is hard
to decide if a judge will implement a non-competition agreement. While the privileged insights of a business are important,
the law additionally puts value to a person's opportunity to seek after other
work. To be enforceable Courts more often than not require that a contract not
to compete be sensible. In California, non-competes are adequately unlawful
except if you are selling a business. Different states will implement a few provisions,
as a rule the trade secret protection, however not the work limitations.
Answer:
[D] All of the above.
Explanation:
Front running is the process by which a party to a share purchase has initial knowledge of the future market value of shares that are yet to be issued and makes a proprietary buy order for stock ahead of the client's order.
Normally this can be as a result of insider information which is prohibited, but the options above all allow this practice.
-If the firm can demonstrate that the trade is unrelated to the customer's block order
-If the trade was made to fill or facilitate the customer's block order
-If the trade is executed on a national stock exchange and in compliance with its rules
