Francine must purchase $1,500 of coffee for her coffee cart business. Kevin agrees to loan Francine $1,500, accepting as collate
ral Francine’s cart. They put their agreement in writing and sign it. Francine keeps possession of the cart. Does Kevin have an enforceable security interest?
Judging from the perception of simple contract, which is a legally binding contract on parties that have entered into it,for the contract to be legally enforceable the following conditions must be met.
There must be an agreement between parties involved,this is demonstrated by Kevin offering to loan Francine $1500, which was met the latter's acceptance.
Consideration is when both parties promises to give something of value in exchange for value received, which is also satisfied in this case,as Francine promises to return $1500 in exchange for same amount borrowed and by extension Kevin has right to repossess the cart.
Lastly, both parties intended to create legally enforceable relations as well the fact that they are both capable (of age) and the transaction entered is legal in law parlance.
In conclusion, the above points show that Kevin has an enforceable security interest.
debit to Accounts Receivable for $3,500 credit to Sales for $3,430
Explanation:
Merchandise with a sales price of $3,500 is sold on account with terms 2/10, n/60. The journal entry to record the sale would include a debit to Accounts Receivable for $3,500 credit to Sales for $3,430.
Since the goods were sold on account, it means that it was sold on credit and an entry to cash will be a wrong entry. The right Journal entry will be a debit to accounts receivable for the total amount and a credit to sales for the total amount less the proposed discount amount of 2%
Certain types of contracts must be in writing pursuant to the statute of "frauds".
A state statute that necessitates certain kinds of agreements to be written, expected to guarantee that terms of imperative contracts are not overlooked, misconstrued, or fabricated, reason for this is to smother misrepresentation, fraudulent cases, some of the time envisioned in light of ensuing occasions or basically invoked.
Evaluating performance helps determine whether to promote, transfer or layoff but it does not determine whether or not an employee can use sick leave. You can lower an evaluation based upon performance and abuse of sick leave. If an employee is frequently absent without an excuse, then their performance and work tasks will suffer. This allows a manager to lower a performance rating.
