Answer:
D) productive efficiency and allocative efficiency but not necessarily equity.
Explanation:
Countries that have a market economy are capitalistic countries and those that favor command economies (centrally planned) are called socialist countries. No country is totally capitalistic (since governments, taxes, regulations, etc., exist), and no country is totally socialist either. But countries are classified depending on which economic system they favor.
Canada favors free markets, and by doing so, it allows market forces to allocate resources. Consumers are free to decide what to buy and at what price, and producers are free to decide what to sell and at what price. Since private actors are free to decide how to allocate resources, they are allocated more efficiently.
But the negative aspect of capitalism is that income and wealth distribution is very unequal.
Answer and Explanation:
There is no copyright infringement here. Savant homes had not taken a copyright protection for the design prior to this time. Also in the case it was found that the design is not in fact a unique design by Savant homes as it is used widely and was common before savant homes used it. And so it was a dummy model for everyone to copy from. Therefore the infringement was considered invalid as there was no ground for savant homes to claim it as am intellectual property
Answer:
i think its training to prepare students for actual work in their chosen field.
The best option for her to choose is the one called Anual Compounding. With the rest of the compoundings she will have to pay more money. With a semi-annual rate she wil have to pay almost 1000 dollars more than in an anual compounding. With a quarterly period she will have to pay almost the same amount as a semi-annual period. Now with a monthly period she would have to pay almost 2000 dollars of interest.
This was not copied from a website or someone else. This was from my last year report.
At the point when both cohesiveness and performance norms are high, productivity will be high.
<u>Explanation</u>:
It is genuine with respect to the impact of gathering cohesiveness and execution standards on bunch profitability.
Gathering cohesiveness is one of the trademark highlights of the gatherings, which is significant from the behaviouristic perspective. Cohesiveness is how much the gathering individuals are pulled in to one another and are persuaded to remain in the gatherings. Cohesiveness characterizes the level of closeness that the individuals feel with the gatherings. It is comprehended as the degree of preferring every part has towards others in the gathering and how far everybody needs to stay as an individual from the gathering.
"Cohesiveness alludes to the degree of solidarity 'in the gathering and is reflected in individuals' adjustment to the standards of the gathering, the sentiment of fascination for one another and needing to be co-individuals from the gathering." Attraction, cohesiveness, and similarity are altogether interwoven. The more the individuals feel pulled in to the gathering, the more noteworthy will be the gathering cohesiveness. The more noteworthy the cohesiveness, the more prominent the impact of the gathering individuals to convince each other to adjust to the gathering standards. The more prominent the congruity, the more noteworthy the character of the individuals to the gathering and the more noteworthy the gathering cohesiveness.
