I think the toxic sludge is a fine addition. If someone were to remove the toxic sludge then I sure wouldn't be happy. The toxic sludge isn't hurting anybody, why should they remove it? It's the people who are a threat to the toxic sludge, not the other way around.
Answer:
The revenue should not be recognized because of the unusual and subjective terms under which the buyer has the right to return the product.
Explanation:
If a buyer of goods has the right to return a product, the transaction is considered a sale with a right of return. When regular sales are made under these terms and there is a reasonable basis for estimating returns, revenue from the sale ought to be recognized and an allowance for returnsshould be established.
However, when the rate of returns cannot be reasonably estimated, revenue is not recognized until the right of return expires. Even though the goods were shipped in 2015, until the buyer accepts the goods or the right to return them expires, revenue would not be recognized.
I believe the answer is: Biases
The person who made such comments usually had a a really strong preference in one economic system, to the point where that person refuse to acknoweldge the weakness in their preferred view and the strength in the opposing view. This bias could easily be held by all sides.
Answer:
answer B
Explanation:
I took the test and i got it correct I did not know what it was than guessed and got it right.
Directoffered some rights to the local
populationplaced heavy restrictions on the
local populationallowed the local population to
participate in governmentgave the local population no rights
Indirect Control
did not give the local population
positions in governmentforced the local population to adapt
<span>to European culture</span>
