3 years ago

Are these two figures congruent? Why or why not?

1 answer:

7 0

Yes they are congruent because they have just been translated in a rotation. But they still hold the same area and perimeter.

You might be interested in

Stels [109]

(f+g) (n) = (–5n +1 ) + (- 6n +2) = –11n +3

(f+g) (n) = –11n +3

(f+g) (–2) = – 11 (–2) +3 = 22 +3 = 25

I hope I helped you^_^

3 0

3 years ago

HACTEHA [7]

The only ways i thought of was 0.7, 0.70, and 0.700 .

7 0

3 years ago

GrogVix [38]

The answer to this is D!!!!

3 0

3 years ago

Natasha2012 [34]

Answer:

Rotational symmetry of 180 degrees around the origin - yes

Rotational symmetry of 270 degrees around the origin - no

Step-by-step explanation:

thanks to math bits notebook we can see a visual representation

As you can see the parallelogram has rotational symmetry of 180

7 0

3 years ago

galina1969 [7]

Answer:

x = 11/2

Step-by-step explanation:

just go by each step

3 0

2 years ago