Whilst supervisors look at terrible overall performance in an employee, they're maximum in all likelihood to blame the employee for missing potential.
Whilst businesses treat personnel pretty, everybody wins
- Making decision-making transparent.
- providing employees with possibilities to offer input/remarks.
- Acknowledging employees' contributions.
- Making time for personnel to provide input on decisions while feasible.
- Treating employees with respect and dignity.
Treating personnel with admiration, showing appreciation for their paintings, and being an encourager will create a preference in personnel to additionally treat clients and clients properly. it will contribute to better productiveness tiers and profitability. It makes employees need to return to work and no longer dread it.
The moves of an employee's direct manager have an important effect on employee engagement. Managers who fail to engage their personnel through growing nice relationships with them can cause an exodus of pinnacle expertise. The price in time and assets to update these employees may be inordinate.
When employees are handled nicely, they may be a long way less in all likelihood to cease, which means that you could store the money and time you'll spend on hiring new employees. selling from within way that employees are much more likely to stay at the job longer, considering that they realize it may result in a higher role and/or salary.
Learn more about employees here: brainly.com/question/1190099
#SPJ4
Answer:
Explanation:
a company that is considered the most effective in its industry, for example, because it sells more products, makes more profit, or has a better known brand than its competitors: The industry leader with a 30% market share, it is expected to grow 35% a year.
Answer:
$118,421
Explanation:
first we must calculate the expected value of the risky portfolio = ($70,000 x 0.5) + ($200,000 x 0.5) = $135,000
since your risk premium is 8% and the risk free rate is 6%m then you should discount the expected value by 8% + 6% = 14% to determine its current market price
= $135,000 / (1 + 14%) = $118,421
Answer:
1. Economics - The social science concerned with how individuals, institutions, and society make optimal (best) choices under conditions of scarcity.
2. Opportunity cost - The next-best thing that must be forgone in order to produce one more unit of a given product.
3. Marginal analysis - Making choices based on comparing marginal benefits with marginal costs.
4. Utility - The pleasure, happiness, or satisfaction obtained from consuming a good or service.
<u>Solution and Explanation:</u>
As the utility function is concave in shape, so person is risk averse. Thus, he will not accept the gamvle.
The difference between utility at point A&C = 70 minus 65 = $5, is less than a the difference between A&B = 65 minus 55 = $10
<u>MCQ:
</u>
Answer is option a&d - risk averse people fear a lot for losing money, thus they overestimate the probability of loss
Since, shape of utility function is concave, hence the double derivative of utility with respect to wealth is negative, so utility falls at an decreasing rate , as wealth increases