Answer:
no solution
Step-by-step explanation:
3(2x + 7) ≤ 6(x - 4) ← divide both sides by 3
2x + 7 ≤ 2(x - 4)
2x + 7 ≤ 2x - 8 ( subtract 2x from both sides )
7 ≤ - 8 ← False statement
This means the inequality has no solution
Assuming 0.4 is in fact, 2 divided by 5 (and not an approximation of some number that would require an infinite amount of decimal places to exactly express), then multiplication by 0.4 is the same as multiplying by 2 and dividing by 5.
This means that multiplying any rational number by 2/5 will yield another rational number (as given x/y as an input, where x and y are integers, and multiplying it by 2/5 giving 2x/5y, will mean that 2x and 5y are also integers, and the result is also rational)
If we multiply an irrational number by 2/5, however, the result will be irrational.
So your answer is any number not in the set of rational numbers, multiplied by 0.4, will yield an irrational number.
Answer:
z= 6
Step-by-step explanation:
You check it by plugging the value, z, into the equation.
11(6)-5=9(6)+7
61=61
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The price is x
50% of the price is $35
- x*0.5 = 35
- x = 35/0.5
- x = 70
Answer is $70
Answer:
21,42,84,168,336,672, 1,344
Step-by-step explanation:
The pattern is to multiply the previous term by 2 to find the next term. The seventh term should be 1,344.