Ask question

Ask question

All categories

2 years ago

8

Mark needs 40 feet of fencing to do two sides of his back yard. The fencing he wants is sold in sections of 5 1/2 foot lengths.

How many sections will Mark need to have enough to fence the two sides?

1 answer:

Anarel [89]2 years ago

8 0

6969 and 6969 also 7695 cindienbd gehid uyodg hddkjydg sv sousy syjot dfd doyu

You might be interested in

When you have two shapes to compare on a coordinate plane, you can determine the scale factor, knowing that the transformation w

musickatia [10]

Assume that the initial coordinates are (x,y) and that the dilated coordinates are (x',y').

The dilation is therefore:
(x,y) ............> (x',y')

Now, let's assume that the dilation factor is k.
Therefore:
x' = kx
y' = ky

Based on the above, all the student has to do is get the initial coordinates and the final ones and then substitute in any of the above two equations to get the value of k.

Example:
Assume an original point at (2,4) is dilated to coordinates (4,8). Find the dilation factor.
Assume the dilation coefficient is k.
(x,y) are (2,4) and (x',y') are (4,8)
Therefore:
x' = kx .........> 4 = k*2 ..........> k = 2
or:
y' = ky ..........> 8 = k*4 .........> k = 2
Based on the above, the dilation coefficient would be 2.

Hope this helps :)

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Consider the ODE, dy dx = y 2 1 + x (2) subject to condition y = 1 when x = 0, use your Euler code from class (modified if neces

makkiz [27]

Answer:

Computation.

Step-by-step explanation:

I'm not really sure if that's the analytical solution of the inital value problem,

because y(0)=11-ln(1-0)(3)=11. Howevwer, let us procede with the given values...

Let us assume that we are going to use euler with n=2 (two steps) and h=0.2(the size of each step)

The update rules of the Euler Methode are

$X_i = X_{i-1}+h=X_0+ih$

$m_i=\dfrac{dY}{dX} \biggr \rvert_{x_i} \\\\Y_{i+1}=m_i\cdot h+y_i$

Since the initial value problem tells us that Y=1 when X=0, we know that

$X_0=0$ and that $Y_0=1$ . Then, we have

$X_0=0\\\\X_1=0.2\\\\X_2=0.4$

and

$Y_0=1\\\\m_0=21 \cdot Y_0 + X_0 \cdot 2=21 \cdot 1 + 0=21\\\\Y_1=0.2 \cdot 21 + 1 =5.2\\\\m_1=21 \cdot Y_1 + X_1\cdot 2=21 \cdot 5.2 + 0.2 \cdot 2=109.6\\ \\Y_2=m_1 \cdot h + Y_1 = 109.6 \cdot 0.2 + 5.2= 27.12$

which gives us the points (0,1), (0.2, 5.2) and (0.4, 27.12).

Now, since we want to compare the analyticaland the Euler result, we first compute the value of y=11-ln(1-x)(3) for the values x=0, 0.2 and 0.4. We get that

$y(0)=11-\ln(1-0)(3)=11-ln(1)(3)=11\\\\Y(1)=11-\ln(1-0.2)(3)=11.67\\\\Y(2)=11-\ln(1-0.4)(3)=12.53$

and we compute $Y(i)-Y_i$ for each i.

It holds

$Y(0)-Y_0=11-1=10\\\\Y(1)-Y_1=11.67-5.2=6.47\\\\Y(2)-Y_2=12.53-27.12=-14.59$

which tells us that we have a really bad approximation, as I already stated there must be a mistake in the analytical solution since the intial values don't coincide. Also note that the curve that we get using the euler methose is growing faster than the analitical solution.

4 0

3 years ago

Multiple w and 8.Then,add 5

saw5 [17]

Answer:

8w+5

Step-by-step explanation:

8*w=8w

8w+5

3 0

3 years ago

What is the inverse of f(x) = x/5 -2

Cerrena [4.2K]

Answer:

y= 5x+10

Step-by-step explanation:

Inverse basically means y is now x and x is now y.

y= x/5 -2 becomes x= y/5 -2

Remember to always leave your equation f(x) = ...

i.e. y =...

x= y/5 -2

add 2 both sides

x+2 = y/5

multiply 5 both sides

5(x+2) = y

Hence,

y= 5x + 10

Hope this helps!

Please mark brainliest if you think I helped! Would really appreciate!

8 0

3 years ago

The figure below shows a straight line AB intersected by another straight line t:

BaLLatris [955]

When two straight lines intersect, the pairs of nonadjacent angles in opposite posi-tions are known as vertical angles.

If a segment AB is intersected by a transversal labeled t, then ∠1 and ∠3 and ∠2 and ∠4 are vertically angles formed by the transversal t on the segment AB.

Angles ∠1 and ∠2 can be described as adjacent and supplementary angles, so

$m\angle 1+m\angle 2=180^{\circ}$ .

Angles ∠3 and ∠2 can be also described as adjacent and supplementary angles, so

$m\angle 3+m\angle 2=180^{\circ}$ .

Subtract from the first equation the second equation:

$m\angle 1+m\angle 2-(m\angle 3+m\angle 2)=180^{\circ}-180^{\circ},\\ m\angle 1-m\angle 3=0,\\ m\angle 1=m\angle 3$ .

Similarly you can prove that $m\angle 2=m\angle 4$ .

4 0

3 years ago