<h2>
Answer: C 375 cm²</h2>
Step by step explanation: The last answer i wrote was wrong, so i retook the quiz and got 100% and this was right.
Answer:
10.3
Step-by-step explanation:
hope this helps, if any genius answers as well, give brainliest to them
Answer:
<h2>Kelly is wrong, with this congruent parts, we can conclude that triangles are congruent.</h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
To demonstrate congruent triangles, we need to use the proper postulates. There are at least 5 postulates we can use.
- Angle-Angle-Side Theorem (AAS theorem).
- Hypotenuse-Leg Theorem (HL theorem).
- Side-Side-Side Postulate (SSS postulate).
- Angle-Side-Angle Postulate (ASA postulate).
- Side-Angle-Side Postulate (SAS postulate).
In this case, Kelly SAS postulate, because the corresponding sides-angles-sides are congruent, i.e., KL ≅ MN and LM ≅ KN, also, all corresponding angles are congruent.
So, as you can see, only using SAS postulate, the congruency can be demonstrated. (Refer to the image attached to see an example of SAS postulate)
X = rate of mechanic who worked 5 hours
y = rate of mechanic who worked 15 hours
x + y = 200
5x + 15y = 1950
you find the first variable in one of the equations, then subsitute the result into the other equation. your answer would be:
the mechanic who worked for 5 hours charged $105 per hour, the one who worked 15 hours charged $95 per hour.
hope this helps :)