Answer:
Ellison Company should recognize compensation expense on its books in the amount of $600
Explanation:
Solution
The transaction in the books of Ellison Company during the period of July 1st 2010 to December 31st 2010
On July 1st the share value was $30 *400 = 12000
On October 1st 2010 sold at $ 36 * 400 = 14400
The gain on this transaction was = $2,400
31st July 2010, less compensation expenses =$ 1,800
The fair vale to be recorded as a gain = $ 600
Answer:
D. Computer manufacturers have aggressively started hiring more staff
Explanation:
Answer:
2,000
Explanation:
On average, a person who have a full time job works will work approximately 2,000 hours each year reason been that we have 5 working days in a week and standard working hours in a weeks is 40 hours (5days×8hours daily) which means 8 hours daily , secondly we have 52 weeks in a year, now assuming that person takes 2 weeks off each year for his or her vacation we would have 50 weeks left (52 weeks-2 weeks vacation) which means that the person would be working 50 weeks of the year multiply by 40 hours a week which will give us a total of 2,000 hours each year.
40 work hours weekly× 50 weeks yearly
=2,000 hours of work each year
Therefore on average, a person with a full time job works approximately 2,000 hours each year.
With respect to binding Frakking Mining to contracts, Emery is: B. an agent and has the authority.
<h3>What is contract?</h3>
A contract can be defined as an agreement between two or more parties in which the parties involve tend to agreed to the terms and condition of the contract.
Hence, if Emery serves in a representative capacity for Frakking's Mining Corporation owners with regards to binding Frakking Mining to contracts, Emery is will be an agent and tend to have the authority.
Therefore the correct option is B.
Learn more about contract here:brainly.com/question/984979
#SPJ1
Answer:
<u>Predatory</u>.
Explanation:
This predatory pricing strategy is used when a company aims to create entry barriers for new competitors, significantly lower the price to gain new customers and drive competitors away. The cons of this strategy is that in addition to being illegal, lost revenue is not always recovered, and there are other factors that drive competitors away, not just price.