1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
AVprozaik [17]
3 years ago
9

Two key features of Linehan's diathesis-stress theory of borderline personality disorder are Group of answer choices object repr

esentation and cognitive style. cognitive bias and attribution error. ego functioning and transference. emotional dysregulation and experiences of invalidation.
Social Studies
1 answer:
spayn [35]3 years ago
7 0

Answer: Key features of Linehan's diathesis-stress theory of borderline personality disorder are;

1.) Emotional dysregulation and

2.)Experiences of invalidation.

Explanation: Linehan's diathesis-stress theory explains a disorder that is caused by stress. A diathesis is a mental conception that may result from genetic, psychological, biological, or situational factors.

You might be interested in
The expectation that women will be emotionally supportive is an example of sociology
aniked [119]
The expectation that women will be emotionally supportive is an example of "expressive role".

A woman's role in the family is an 'expressive role'. That means that a lady's familial part is to give mind, love, love, security and all the fundamental passionate help a relative may require. As opposed to men who have an 'instrumental role' as the provider or earning member of the family.

6 0
3 years ago
in the past, behaviorists were not likely to view cognition as a part of learning because cognition __________. a. does not affe
Sidana [21]
It is b disproved thier theories
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
According to Baumrind, what type of parents expect mature, independent, and age-appropriate behavior from their child, and show
Black_prince [1.1K]

Answer:

Authorative

Explanation:

Parents are authorative in this situation as they want to give the children the best but keep high standards toward behaviour

8 0
3 years ago
Why did the constitution grant congress the power to create "inferior courts���? the builders of the constitution ensured the ex
Neko [114]
Congress and the Judiciary Act of 1789<span>

When the First Congress turned to the organization of the judicial branch, much of the debate centered on whether to establish lower federal courts or to rely on existing state courts to exercise federal jurisdiction. Advocates of a strong central government thought a national system of federal courts was an essential requirement for energetic government. Other members of Congress, recalling the colonial experience under British rule, thought that justice was best served by courts tied to local communities. Those who were suspicious of the concentration of national power wanted to grant state courts authority to hear all cases involving federal law or to limit local federal courts to admiralty and maritime law. The judiciary act approved in September 1789 established a federal court system with broad jurisdiction, but the act reserved a significant role for state courts and guaranteed that the diversity of legal traditions throughout the country would be recognized in the local federal courts.

The Judiciary Act of 1789 established three types of federal courts. The Supreme Court, with a chief justice and five associate justices, would meet twice a year in the nation’s capital and hear appeals from lower federal courts and from the state supreme courts. The Supreme Court would also exercise the limited original jurisdiction defined by the Constitution. In each state and in Kentucky and Maine (then parts of other states), a district court with a single judge would have exclusive jurisdiction to hear cases involving admiralty and maritime law and conduct trials of minor federal crimes. The district courts shared with the state courts jurisdiction over small suits brought by the United States.

The most important federal cases would be initiated in the third type of court, called circuit courts, which would convene in the same judicial districts in which the district courts met. The circuit courts had no judges of their own, but were served by two Supreme Court justices and the local district judge. (Congress soon revised the law to require only one justice on each circuit court.) Congress grouped the judicial districts into regional circuits for the purpose of assigning justices to serve on the circuit courts within that region. The circuit courts would hear some appeals from the district courts, but they were primarily trial courts. The circuit courts had exclusive jurisdiction over serious federal crimes and shared with the state courts jurisdiction over suits involving disputes above a certain monetary value, suits involving the U.S. government, and suits between citizens of different states.

Congress protected distinctive state legal traditions by drawing the judicial districts to coincide with state boundaries and by providing for the use of the respective state’s rules for most district and circuit court proceedings and for the selection of federal juries. Perhaps most important for protection of regional legal cultures, the assignment of “circuit riding” duties for Supreme Court justices ensured that the judges on the nation’s highest court would learn about local legal procedures and would interact with citizens at the point where cases entered the federal judicial system. The Judiciary Act also promoted a local orientation of the lower courts by requiring district judges to live in the district where they served. In response to widespread concerns that defendants in federal trials would be forced to appear in distant courts, the Judiciary Act required civil trials to be held in the district in which a defendant was served with a writ and trials involving the death penalty to be held in the county where the crime occurred.

I hope all this helps I am taking judicial law in school .
</span>
4 0
3 years ago
How did the American Revolution affect Canada?
Shalnov [3]

Answer

The American Revolution led to the Loyalists flooding north and helping to populate the Maritime Provinces and what became the Eastern Townships of Quebec. They also, pretty much on their own, created what's now Ontario.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Explain what you would do in the following situation. You are hanging out at your house after school with a group of friends. On
    8·2 answers
  • According to the place-time mode of interaction, when people are in the same place, but at different times, this is an example o
    15·1 answer
  • How are waves and energy related? (you can just search it up if you want but please help)
    6·1 answer
  • Why do people write online posts?
    12·2 answers
  • In this religion the three most important deities (gods) included Shiva, Vishnu, and Brahma.
    14·2 answers
  • Madison was chosen to star as Dorothy in her middle school's production of The Wizard of Oz. Her soccer practice is at the same
    9·2 answers
  • Does the Electoral College still make sense for today's election? Why or why not?
    11·1 answer
  • You have your own car, which you make monthly payments on, by working a part time job. You must also pay for your own gas. Your
    12·1 answer
  • What makes learning permanent??<br><br>​
    8·1 answer
  • dontrell and ebony are expecting their first child this week, but dontrell has an important meeting at corporate headquarters. t
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!