In this case the perfect tender rule
b. does not apply.
Explanation:
The perfect tender rule has certain exceptions where it cannot be applied to the tender parties and the probates of the tender.
If there is a government ruling against the use of certain products that are necessary for the tender to be completed and the outlaw happens after the tender is signed but before it is completed as a consignment then it cannot be done.
This would come under the ambit of an emergency where the governed ruling makes such deals null and void.
Answer:
B. Maybe. The FTC would scrutinize the merger and make a case-by-case decision.
Explanation:
If we considered the historical guidelines of FTC for the merger purpose so may be FTC could permit the merger between the two firms that could result in HHI of 1,025 after the merger as the merger represent the moderal level of the concentration in the market area so here FTC should analyzes the merger with cash to cash basis
Therefore the option b is correct
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "D": disparate-impact discrimination claim.
Explanation:
A disparate-impact discrimination claim is one filed because there is a presumed act of unintentional discrimination at work. This could be the result of requesting employees with certain abilities which disfavors a sector of the workforce of the firm. The company has to prove the feature requested for the job position is necessary for the regular development of the activities if such position.
Answer:
1. Drawings A/c. dr. 15,000
To Cash A/c. 15,000
2. Cash A/c. Dr. 63,000
To Sales A/c. 63,000
3. Drawings A/c. Dr. 12,000
To Cash A/c. 12,000
4. Purchases A/c. Dr. 31,000
To Creditors A/c. 31,000
5. Drawings A/c. Dr. 16,000
To Purchases A/c. 16,000
6. Dalip Singh A/c. Dr.35,000
To Sales A/c. 35,000
7. Rent A/c. Dr. 22,000
To Bank A/c. 22,000
8. Purchases A/c. Dr. 19,000
To Cash A/c. 19,000
