1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lara [203]
3 years ago
5

What are the implications of a society that focuses on maximizing pleasure and minimizing pain?

Social Studies
2 answers:
Phantasy [73]3 years ago
6 0

This is a question that refers to philosophical utilitarianism.

It is the search for the maximum happiness and pleasure, with the least possible suffering, but with an implicit moral question. When we are led to the feeling of pain or pleasure, we determine the way forward and know what is right or wrong.

In this way, it is possible that we are facing a moral dilemma. In our quest for happiness or minimizing our pain, our actions can impact others. That is, utilitarianism is essentially a teleological and consequentialist theory. Therefore, we must seek the impartial maximization of the happiness of all affected by our attitudes, regardless of the affective ties.

vitfil [10]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The question of what are the implication of a society that focuses on maximizing pleasure and minimizing pain is a pretty broad one, and complicated too. However, there are many implications to this focus in life.

The first is that ensuring utter pleasure and happiness, and avoiding pain, is practically impossible, so that people who attempt it are going to find themselves fully frustrated as their goal will never be reached

A second problem is, how do you determine when you have maximum pleasure or minimum pain? What are the limits to seeking both ends of the spectrum? Because people whose life only focuses on pleasure, and avoid pain, can become reckless in that search, and will do anything to acquire that pleasure. However, when and what, will determine there has been enough pleasure? And how do you determine there has been very little pain?

Third, it creates a sense of isolationism from others, and of utilitarism. The first because the objective is completely personal, it does not include others, because when you are related to others, there is not way to control pain and pleasure. If you are related to others, pain and pleasure will be part of your life. Also utilitarism because people will use any and all means, including other people, to reach their desired goal. They will use any means to reach pleasure, even if that hurts another, and also use all means to avoid pain.

These are only a few of the implications of a society that focuses on the premise: maximizing pleasure, minimizing pain.

You might be interested in
What is the formal role of the states amending the constitution ??
uysha [10]

Answer:

They ratify amendments.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please help me with the answers QUICK
vitfil [10]
Is that civics or not
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Younger voters are much more likely to identify with the __________ party today.
Mandarinka [93]
Democratic party is the answer
7 0
3 years ago
Chewer. The state in which Susan lives has a statute prohibiting dogs running at large. All dogs are required to be on a leash w
Vikentia [17]

Answer:A. Negligence per se.

Explanation:

Negligence Per Se

In common cases of negligence a person suing the other need to give proof of negligence. The plaintiff must give evidence that relate the conduct of the defendant to their damage or harm done to them which shows that the defendant action were the primary cause for that harm.

When a defendant however violates a regulation or municipal ordinance and as a result of that violation someone is harmed this now becomes negligence per se.

Now under negligence per se the defendant's actions are not evaluated to have been reasonable or not but are considered unreasonable since they violated the rule or regulation.

The plaintiff must be under the class protected by that law or regulation and there must evidence of violation of that law by the defendant.

3 0
3 years ago
Why do you think scientists use multiple markers to identify individual elephants?
Harlamova29_29 [7]
When a scientist is performing genetic tests in order to identify a specific individual they use specific markers that are found in the short-tandem repeat section of the DNA sequence. These regions are the most variable among the individuals that belong to the same species, therefore they are the best choice for trying to identify a specific individual.
The more markers they use, they can be more certain that this is a specific individual, in our case an elephant.
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The National Transportation Safety Board has proposed a new regulation that would require children under the age of two to be st
    8·1 answer
  • What is one example of a bill? A. A declaration of war that has just been issued by both houses of Congress B. A simple resoluti
    7·2 answers
  • What is a primary benefit of using the linear optimization model?
    7·1 answer
  • Professor Tilton measured the variable "feelings toward drafting women" with the categories strongly agree, agree, indifferent,
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following best describes President Carter's goals regarding his energy policy?
    9·1 answer
  • 51 cm, 4.55 cm, 4.53 cm, 4.5 cm, and 4.6 cm. even though you cannot see the line they measured, which of the recorded measuremen
    11·1 answer
  • During the Northern Renaissance, the use of ____ painting was developed in Flanders. a. oil c. realism b. fresco d. chiaroscuro
    8·2 answers
  • Which country is still a colony of a European Country?
    7·1 answer
  • How did the Seminole react differently from the Cherokee and Choctaw when the United Stages governament wanted them to move west
    13·2 answers
  • Answer now please!!!<br>need it now​
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!