Answer:
x=16 or any value less than 16.
Step-by-step explanation:
16x5=80 and subtract 10 you get 70. X has to equal a value that makes the whole left side of the equation "smaller" than the irght side, and 16 or any value less than that would accomplsish this.
There exists a similar question that would lead to the relationship of the given circumference to the unknown value. The radius of the larger circle is 12 cm. The formula for determining the circumference is,
C = 2πr
Substituting the known value,
C = 2π x 12 cm = 24π cm
Thus, the answer is letter B.
The distance between a point

on the given plane and the point (0, 2, 4) is

but since

and

share critical points, we can instead consider the problem of optimizing

subject to

.
The Lagrangian is

with partial derivatives (set equal to 0)




Solve for

:


which gives the critical point

We can confirm that this is a minimum by checking the Hessian matrix of

:


is positive definite (we see its determinant and the determinants of its leading principal minors are positive), which indicates that there is a minimum at this critical point.
At this point, we get a distance from (0, 2, 4) of
Step-by-step explanation:
First factor out the negative sign from the expression and reorder the terms
That's

<u>Using trigonometric </u><u>identities</u>
That's
<h3>

</h3>
<u>Rewrite the expression</u>
That's

We have
<h3>

</h3>
<u>Rewrite the second fraction</u>
That's
<h3>

</h3>
Since they have the same denominator we can write the fraction as

Using the identity
<h3>

</h3>
<u>Rewrite the expression</u>
We have
<h3>

</h3>
<u>Using the trigonometric identity</u>
<h3>

</h3>
<u>Rewrite the expression</u>
That's
<h3>

</h3>
Which is
<h3>

</h3>
<u>Using the trigonometric identity</u>
<h3>

</h3>
Rewrite the expression
That's
<h3>

</h3>
<u>Simplify the expression using symmetry of trigonometric functions</u>
That's
<h3>

</h3>
<u>Remove the parenthesis </u>
We have the final answer as
<h2>

</h2>
As proven
Hope this helps you
It's irrational, √11<span>≈3.3
</span>