<span>President Roosevelt end US isolation and nuetrality during the early years of world war ii by
</span>
Answer:
bill of rights is the answer to that question
01
of 05
Stock Market Crash of 1929
Workers flood the streets in a panic following the Black Tuesday stock market crash on Wall Street, New York City, 1929
Hulton Archive/Archive Photos/Getty Images
Remembered today as "Black Tuesday," the stock market crash of October 29, 1929, was neither the sole cause of the Great Depression nor the first crash that month. The market, which had reached record highs that very summer, had begun to decline in September.
On Thursday, October 24, the market plunged at the opening bell, causing a panic. Though investors managed to halt the slide, just five days later on "Black Tuesday" the market crashed, losing 12 percent of its value and wiping out $14 billion of investments. Two months later, stockholders had lost more than $40 billion dollars. Even though the stock market regained some of its losses by the end of 1930, the economy was devastated. America truly entered what is called the Great Depression.
Answer:
As in England, and some Western European Countries that began to industrialize earlier than the U.S. (Belgium, the Netherlands, Germany, and France), industrialization brought massive changes to American workers.
For one, decade after decade more people moved to the cities, and less people stayed in the countryside as farmers. A big difference is that farmers in the U.S. frequently owned the land while industrial workers did not own the factories.
This means that workers make a living by earning a wage for their work in the factory, while farmers usually make a living either by consuming the food they produce, or by selling the food, or a combination of both. This gives a greater autonomy and power to the farmer, but not necessarily a higher income.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
The answer is A because the excerpt talks about how an interference with congress would alarm many states of the union. Thus further meaning if congress got between states and their right to own slaves it would become a bigger problem. The excerpt goes on further to say that it is well within ones rights to own a slave, further implying that Democrats are pushing anti-slavery.
