Answer:
The correct answer for: What fMRI-measured brain activity would be expected in a subject witnessing a high-content argument? is: A. The frontal lobes in high-motivation, high-knowledge people are more active than the temporal lobes in low-motivation, low-content people.
Explanation:
First of all, this is a very difficult question because the answers are focused on the excitement of the subjects. When fMRIbrain activity is measured in a subject witnessing high-content arguments the frontal lobe will activate in high motivation high knowledge people. While the temporal lobe will activate in low motivation, low content people. So the frontal lobes will show more activity because they are going to be stimulated while the temporal lobe won't, making the stimulation a determining factor of the level of activity in the brain.
The fact that you would receive a ten percent discount is a fixed ratio.
<h3>What is a fixed ratio?</h3>
A fixed ratio can be described to be a type of ratio that is constant. This type of ratio is used for scheduling reinforcement.
The reinforcement is used here after a given number of responses have been done. The answer is fixed ratio due to the fact that the discount comes after the completion of five orders.
Read ,more on fixed ratio here:
brainly.com/question/24957967
Directed mostly at
"individuals" <span>rather than</span>
"corporations".
White<span>-collar crime</span> alludes to
fiscally roused, act of illegal standards but not included violence, conferred
by business and government experts. Inside criminology, it was first
characterized by Edwin Sutherland in 1939 who proposed that a wrongdoing done
by a man of respectability and high economic wellbeing over the span of his
occupation.
Answer:
All of the above
Explanation:
It is always very important to deliver speeches that are very unique, addressing the context or the situation at that time. When the speech is being delivered using another unrelated concept created by someone else, the speaker may likely seem very insincere before the audience, and they may also not be able to understand why the speaker talks quite differently from the issue at hand. The listeners can as well lack engagement with his speech as seen in the case of Walter.
Answer:
Explanation:
the rights of criminal defendants, including the right to a public trial without unnecessary delay, the right to a lawyer, the right to an impartial jury, and the right to know who your accusers are and the nature of the charges and evidence against you.